People v. Mitchell

Decision Date19 August 1974
Docket NumberNo. 59543,59543
Citation317 N.E.2d 779,22 Ill.App.3d 817
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. O. C. MITCHELL, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtUnited States Appellate Court of Illinois

James J. Doherty, Public Defender, Cook County, Chicago (Saul H. Brauner, Chicago, of counsel), for defendant-appelllant.

Bernard Carey', State's Atty., County of Cook, Chicago (Patrick T. Driscoll, Jr. and Michael A. Tyrrell, Chicago, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM:

O. C. Mitchell, defendant, was originally charged by indictment with murder and aggravated battery. After a jury trial, defendant was found guilty of aggravated battery and sentenced to a term of three to ten years. Defendant appeals, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

At trial, Carie Mitchell testified that on July 8, 1972, she lived in the second-floor, rear apartment at 1559 S. Christiana, Chicago, Illinois, with her son, the defendant O. C. Mitchell, and Ernest Wright. At approximately 3:30 p.m., Ernest Wright returned home. She observed that he had been drinking. Wright left her apartment and went to the apartment of Rosa Lee Anderson, Ms. Mitchell's granddaughter, which was located on the same floor of the building. Approximately 10 minutes later, Ms. Mitchell went to her granddaughter's apartment and saw Ernest Wright lying on the floor of the bathroom. Ms. Mitchell observed the defendant hit Wright's head between the bathtub and radiator six or seven times. Ms. Mitchell returned to her apartment, followed by the defendant. A short time later, Ms. Mitchell observed Wright coming up the back stairs. Defendant confronted Wright and kicked him in the face, causing him to fall down the steps. Defendant then dragged Wright into the back yard. A short time later, the police arrived and Wright was taken to Mount Sinai Hospital, where he died on July 23, 1972.

Anthony Finnelly, a Chicago Police investigator, testified that he was assigned the investigation of the death of Ernest Wright. Pursuant to that investigation, a warrant was procured for the arrest of the defendant. Defendant was placed under arrest on July 26, 1972.

Dr. Edward Shalgos, a pathologist for the coroner of Cook County, testified that on July 23, 1972, he performed a pathological examination on the body of Ernest Wright. An internal examination of the head of Wright revealed three hemorrhages. Dr. Shalgos testified that in his opinion, the hemorrhages were caused by either the application of trauma directly to the head or the striking of the head against an immovable object. The cause of death of Ernest Wright was trauma to the brain and cardiac arrest.

Dr. Hernando Torres testified that Ernest Wright was his patient at Mount Sinai Hospital. When admitted, Wright was confused and unable to talk coherently. Wright had a larceration in the left frontal area, on the nose and another on the face. Wright's condition was stationary for several days and thereafter started to improve slowly. On July 23, 1972, Wright was found to have a respiratory difficulty and quickly went into respiratory failure, causing his death. Dr. Torres testified that Wright's condition, when he entered the hospital, was consistent with the theory that someone had banged his head against the floor and that he had been kicked in the face and fallen down a flight of stairs.

Rosa Lee Anderson, the niece of the defendant, testified that on July 8, 1972, at 4 p.m., Ernest Wright came into her apartment. Defendant was in the kitchen cleaning fish. Wright began to talk to the defendant. Wright suddenly picked up a knife and attempted to stab the defendant. With the knife in his hand, Wright forced defendant back toward the bathroom until Wright himself fell. Ms. Anderson testified that she attempted to help Wright downstairs. As Wright was going down the stairs, he slipped and fell down the stairs. She helped Wright up and he fell down a second flight of stairs. Ms. Anderson testified that she did not at any time see the defendant kick or strike Wright.

On cross-examination, Ms. Anderson testified that on July 8, 1972, she spoke with a police officer at the hospital. She denied telling the police officer that she had heard an argument in the rear of her apartment and had observed a male Negro hitting and kicking Ernest Wright. Ms. Anderson also testified that on September 13, 1972, she testified before the grand jury of Cook County. She denied testifying that on July 8, 1972, Ernest Wright and the defendant had a fight in her apartment.

In rebuttal, Brenda Green, an official court reporter for the circuit court of Cook County, testified that on September 13, 1972, she transcribed the testimony of Rosa Lee Anderson before the Cook County grand jury. At that...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • People v. Pfeiffer
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • 16 Septiembre 1976
    ...as trier of fact to determine the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be given their testimony. (People v. Mitchell (1st Dist. 1974), 22 Ill.App.3d 817, 317 N.E.2d 779.) It is only where the evidence is so improbable or unsatisfactory as to leave a reasonable doubt of guilt that ......
  • People v. Werhollick
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • 19 Agosto 1974
  • People v. Wilkins
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • 1 Marzo 1976
    ... ...         It is a well-established rule that the testimony of a single witness, if positive and credible, is sufficient to sustain a conviction, even though contradicted by the accused. (People v. Mitchell, 22 Ill.App.3d 817, 317 N.E.2d 779.) The defendant characterizes Mrs. Lyles' testimony as inconsistent, and thus not credible. He asserts that Mrs. Lyles testified that she saw a gun in the defendant's hand, and then, on cross-examination, she conceded that she did not see a gun. We do not agree ... ...
  • People v. Runde
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • 29 Diciembre 1976
    ...improbable and therefore we will not substitute our judgment on the issue of credibility for that of the jury. People v. Mitchell (1974), 22 Ill.App.3d 817, 317 N.E.2d 779. It is our judgment that the evidence in this case and the inferences which could properly be drawn from it support the......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT