People v. Moldowan

Decision Date15 May 2002
Docket NumberDocket No. 119812 | 26,Docket No. COA No. 232196.
Citation466 Mich. 862,643 N.W.2d 570
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffery Michael MOLDOWAN, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtMichigan Supreme Court

On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the April 16, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals, is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(F)(2), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the defendant's convictions and REMAND the case to the trial court for a new trial. In this case the prosecutor's two expert witnesses with respect to "bite-mark" evidence have either recanted testimony which concluded that bite marks on the victim were made by the defendant or presented opinion evidence which has now been discredited. As a result, we conclude that the defendant is entitled to relief from judgment pursuant to MCR 6.508(D)(3)(b)(i) and (iii). In support of our conclusion, we note that the prosecutor himself has stated:

"In the totality of the circumstances of this case, it simply is not fair to say that the defendant or defendant's counsel should have known about the problems with the bite-mark evidence prior to trial. The same can also be said with regard to the later-discovered alibi witnesses. Because of the very nature of the drug and prostitution business, these witnesses are difficult to find. Their names are usually fake names, and they certainly do not want to be found. Without the bite-mark evidence and with the additional alibi witnesses, the result of the trial could have been different. For these reasons, it appears that the defendant may have suffered `actual prejudice' as that term is used in MCR 6.508(D)(3)(b)(i) and (iii)."

Accordingly, as stated supra, we REVERSE defendant's convictions and remand to the trial court for a new trial.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Moldowan v. City of Warren
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • July 23, 2009
    ...a key prosecution witness recanted her testimony, the Michigan Supreme Court reversed Moldowan's conviction in 2002. People v. Moldowan, 466 Mich. 862, 643 N.W.2d 570 (2002). On retrial, in February 2003, Moldowan was acquitted of all charges and released, having served nearly twelve years ......
  • Moldowan v. City of Warren
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • July 1, 2009
    ...a key prosecution witness recanted her testimony, the Michigan Supreme Court reversed Moldowan's conviction in 2002. People v. Moldowan, 466 Mich. 862, 643 N.W.2d 570 (2002). On retrial, in February 2003, Moldowan was acquitted of all charges and released, having served nearly twelve years ......
  • Moldowan v. City of Warren
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • August 18, 2009
    ...a key prosecution witness recanted her testimony, the Michigan Supreme Court reversed Moldowan's conviction in 2002. People v. Moldowan, 466 Mich. 862, 643 N.W.2d 570 (2002). On retrial, in February 2003, Moldowan was acquitted of all charges and released, having served nearly twelve years ......
  • Cristini v. City of Warren
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Michigan
    • November 14, 2012
    ...either recanted their testimony regarding the bite mark evidence or had been discredited, a new trial was warranted. People v. Moldowan, 466 Mich. 862, 643 N.W.2d 570 (2002). After the Michigan Supreme Court reversed Moldowan's conviction, the Macomb County prosecutor retried Moldowan begin......
2 books & journal articles
  • Chapter 5 Prosecutors, Police, and Preservation of Evidence
    • United States
    • Carolina Academic Press Wrongful Conviction: Law, Science, and Policy (CAP) 2019
    • Invalid date
    ...a key prosecution witness recanted her testimony, the Michigan Supreme Court reversed Moldowan's conviction in 2002. People v. Moldowan, 643 N.W.2d 570 (Mich. 2002). On retrial, in February 2003, Moldowan was acquitted of all charges and released, having served nearly twelve years in prison......
  • THE BITE MARK DENTISTS AND THE COUNTERATTACK ON FORENSIC SCIENCE REFORM.
    • United States
    • Albany Law Review Vol. 83 No. 3, March 2020
    • March 22, 2020
    ...supra note 94, at 127. (146) Defendant-Appellant's Affidavit Explaining Delayed Application for Leave to Appeal 25, People v. Moldowan, 643 N.W.2d 570 (Mich. 2002) (No. 119812) [hereinafter Royal (147) See Trial Transcript, Cristini & Moldowan 1991, supra note 94, at 127. (148) See Roya......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT