People v. Monsuri

Decision Date12 April 2011
Citation920 N.Y.S.2d 677,2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 03090,83 A.D.3d 870
PartiesThe PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Mohammed MONSURI, appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Barry Stendig of counsel), for appellant, and appellant pro se.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Terry–Ann Llewellyn of counsel; Steven Mizrahi on the memorandum), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mangano, Jr., J.), rendered April 12, 2007, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the People's contention, the defendant's waiver of his right to appeal was not valid ( see People v. Bradshaw, 76 A.D.3d 566, 569, 906 N.Y.S.2d 93,lv. granted 15 N.Y.3d 896, 912 N.Y.S.2d 585, 938 N.E.2d 1020), and therefore the waiver cannot bar review of the defendant's claims.

Insofar as the record permits review of the defendant's claim that his attorney was ineffective, we reject that claim. Counsel provided the defendant with effective representation ( see Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674;People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 147, 444 N.Y.S.2d 893, 429 N.E.2d 400).

The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.

MASTRO, J.P., DILLON, BALKIN and MILLER, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • People v. Pelaez
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 14, 2012
    ...254, 961 N.E.2d 645;People v. Burton, 93 A.D.3d 949, 939 N.Y.S.2d 717;People v. Grant, 83 A.D.3d 862, 921 N.Y.S.2d 285;People v. Monsuri, 83 A.D.3d 870, 920 N.Y.S.2d 677). The SupremeCourt's statements at the plea allocution suggested that waiving the right to appeal was mandatory rather th......
  • People v. Mingo
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 12, 2011
    ...facie showing that they were entitled to that instruction ( see People v. Edwards, 14 N.Y.3d 733, 735, 899 N.Y.S.2d 65, 925 N.E.2d 867; [83 A.D.3d 870] People v. Savinon, 100 N.Y.2d 192, 200–201, 761 N.Y.S.2d 144, 791 N.E.2d 401; People v. Gonzalez, 68 N.Y.2d 424, 427–431, 509 N.Y.S.2d 796,......
  • State v. Joseph McD.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 5, 2013
    ...Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 147, 444 N.Y.S.2d 893, 429 N.E.2d 400;People v. Lebron, 87 A.D.3d 1162, 1163, 929 N.Y.S.2d 877;People v. Monsuri, 83 A.D.3d 870, 920 N.Y.S.2d 677). The appellant's remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate...
  • People v. Lebron
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • September 27, 2011
    ...668, 694, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674; People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 146–147, 444 N.Y.S.2d 893, 429 N.E.2d 400; People v. Monsuri, 83 A.D.3d 870, 920 N.Y.S.2d 677, lv. denied 17 N.Y.3d 808, 929 N.Y.S.2d 568, 953 N.E.2d 806). The defendant's remaining contention does not require reversa......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT