People v. Morgan, Docket No. 157263

• Decision Date: 06 June 1994
• Docket Number: Docket No. 157263
• Citation: 517 N.W.2d 822,205 Mich.App. 432
• Parties: PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sillerton MORGAN, Defendant-Appellee.
• Court: Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US

Page 822

517 N.W.2d 822

205 Mich.App. 432

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sillerton MORGAN, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 157263.

Court of Appeals of Michigan.

Submitted Jan. 19, 1994, at Detroit.

Decided June 6, 1994, at 9:05 a.m.

Released for Publication July 18, 1994.

Frank J. Kelley, Atty. Gen., Thomas L. Casey, Sol. Gen., John D. O'Hair, Pros. Atty., Timothy A. Baughman, Chief of Research, Training, and Appeals, and Rita H. Lewis, Asst. Pros. Atty., for the People.

Graig A. Daly, Detroit, for defendant.

Before JANSEN, P.J., and McDONALD and HOCKING, ^* JJ.

McDONALD, Judge.

Following a bench trial, defendant was convicted of felonious assault, M.C.L. § 750.82; M.S.A. § 28.277. Although the court sentenced defendant to serve twelve to forty-eight months in prison, after announcing the sentence the court immediately suspended it. On appeal, the prosecutor claims the court was without power to suspend indefinitely the execution of defendant's sentence. We agree.

Under our system of state government, the Legislature makes the law, the Governor executes it, and the courts construe and enforce it. People v. Palm, 245 Mich. 396, 223 N.W. 67 (1929). The Legislature alone is conferred with the power to fix the minimum and maximum punishment for all crimes. People v. Smith, 94 Mich. 644, 54 N.W. 487 (1893). A sentence outside statutory limits is invalid. People v. Whalen, 412 Mich. 166, 312 N.W.2d 638 (1981).

The Legislature has provided that a person convicted of felonious assault may be imprisoned for not more than four years, receive a fine of not more than $2,000, receive both such fine and imprisonment, or, under certain circumstances, may be placed on probation. M.C.L. § 750.503; M.S.A. § 28.771, M.C.L. § 771.1; M.S.A. § 28.1131.

At sentencing, the court stated:

I don't see any reason to burden the tax payers who are all ready over burden [sic] and the Probation Department with supervising someone who is able to supervise themselves.

I'm going to sentence him to [sic] minimum of twelve months and a maximum of four years and I'm going to suspend the sentence.

It is clear from the record the court intended to suspend execution of defendant's sentence indefinitely. Affirmation of the suspended sentence would result in defendant suffering no punishment for committing the assault. Because the statute does not provide for the imposition of no form of punishment, we find the sentence outside the statutory limits and therefore invalid. Absent statutory authority, a court may not suspend indefinitely the execution of a sentence. To do so would in effect grant the defendant a pardon for his crime. People v. Brown, 54 Mich. 15, 19 N.W. 571 (1...