People v. Muellner

Decision Date21 March 1979
Docket NumberNo. 77-311,77-311
Citation26 Ill.Dec. 850,70 Ill.App.3d 671,388 N.E.2d 851
Parties, 26 Ill.Dec. 850 PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark MUELLNER, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtUnited States Appellate Court of Illinois

Shaw, Howlett & Schwartz by James J. Knappenberger, Clayton, Mo., Gomric & Strellis, Belleville, for defendant-appellant.

Nicholas G. Byron, State's Atty., Edwardsville, Raymond F. Buckley, Jr., Deputy Director, Gillum Ferguson, Staff Atty., State's Attys., Appellate Service Com'n, Mt. Vernon, for plaintiff-appellee.

KARNS, Justice:

Defendant, Mark Muellner, was convicted by jury in the Circuit Court of Madison County of two counts of rape and two counts of deviate sexual assault. Following a hearing in aggravation and mitigation, defendant was sentenced to concurrent terms of 4 to 8 years imprisonment; however, eleven days after sentence was imposed, the trial court altered the sentence, upon the State's motion, so as to cause the sentences imposed for rape to run consecutively to those imposed for deviate sexual assault. Defendant appeals from his conviction of all offenses and the sentences imposed thereon.

The charges against defendant arose out of events occurring on August 7, 1976, in Madison County during which it was alleged that defendant, co-defendants Donald Jenkins and Richard Knowles, and others committed numerous acts of rape and deviate sexual assault upon two young women, 18 years of age. The cause was originally tried before a jury in February, 1977, but ended in a mistrial when the jury could not agree on a verdict. The record discloses that prior to the commencement of the second trial various pre-trial motions were considered by the court in chambers. Defense counsel moved for a change of venue or a continuance because of a newspaper article which appeared in the Alton Telegraph on April 21, 1977, containing various comments concerning the prosecutors' attitudes toward rape cases and featuring a picture of one of the prosecutors. The newspaper article also referred to the fact that the alleged victims had submitted to lie detector tests some time after the incidents. The court denied the motions and that ruling is not challenged by defendant in this appeal.

The court also granted the State's seven paragraph motion in limine except for paragraph 6. In paragraph 7, which was granted, it was requested that the court exclude any reference to certain record albums purchased by the alleged victims on the evening of August 6, 1976, a matter which the court in the previous trial had ruled irrelevant. It was agreed by the court and counsel that defendant's offer of proof at the first trial pertaining to the purchases be incorporated by reference into the record of this cause. Defendant's offer of proof indicated that his counsel wished to question the alleged victims about two record albums purchased by one of the girls in which he charged there were contained various sexually oriented words and references to drug paraphernalia. As part of the offer of proof, defense counsel cross-examined one of the victims concerning her activities on the night in question, her purchase of the record albums, and her state of mind at the time of the incident. Defense counsel argued that the subject matter and titles of the albums indicated her state of mind at the time she first encountered the men. The offer of proof was denied.

When trial commenced on April 25, 1977, the State called Mary Gavin, a registered nurse at St. Elizabeth's Hospital in Granite City, as its first witness. Gavin testified that the girls had undergone physical and vaginal examinations on the morning of August 7, 1976, and she identified several slides made that morning as well as various items of clothing taken from the girls. She could not recall observing any indication of physical injuries other than in the vaginal area. Another nurse, Connie Pilat, testified to basically the same matters, specifically her assistance during one victim's physical examination. Doctor Joseph Kopp testified that he examined the test slides of both women and found the presence of sperm on each of their vaginal smears, but not on the smears taken from their oral or rectal cavities. Steven Martin, a medical lab technician at St. Elizabeth's Hospital, testified that he performed certain tests on several of the slides which contained specimens from various parts of the women's bodies.

Sergeant Glen Newsome of the Madison County Sheriff's Office testified that he came into contact with the women at approximately 4:40 a. m. on August 7, 1976. He stated that after taking them to St. Elizabeth's Hospital, he returned with the women and other police officers to the scene of the incident. Newsome also identified various pictures, diagrams, and items of evidence he found at the scene.

The victims testified that on the evening of August 6, 1976, they went shopping. One of the girls, who had approximately $50 in her purse, purchased two record albums. While the victims were driving down a Missouri highway later that evening an automobile containing nine or ten males passed them. Shortly thereafter, they passed this car before stopping at a service station to use the restroom. When the women pulled into the service station, the automobile containing the men pulled up alongside their car and the men asked the women if they wanted to go to a party; the women responded negatively. According to one of the victims, two of the men, Richard Knowles and a man identified only as Zack, then entered the automobile over her protests. The two men told the women to drive to a nearby park to meet the other men and they complied with their request.

After driving to the park and returning to the station twice, the driver stopped at another service station where she purchased gasoline. Thereafter, she followed the automobile occupied by the remaining members of the group to a tavern which Knowles entered and then returned to her car. She explained that she didn't know what would have happened to her if she had refused to continue driving and that she was worried and concerned. After the stop at the tavern, she proceeded to follow the other auto to another service station where the girls used the restroom while the man named Zack stood outside the door. The three returned to the automobile and followed the other car over the Mississippi River into Madison County, Illinois. After driving a short distance, the automobiles stopped along the side of a road at a location known as Chouteau Island, and the driver was thereupon instructed by defendant Muellner, who had been in the other automobile, to drive her car down a hill. When she refused, defendant pushed her aside in the seat and drove her auto down the hill.

At that point, the driver related that Zack, Knowles and the defendant dragged her across the ground to a location where they subsequently forced her to have sexual relations with them. At the same time, she observed the other girl being dragged in an opposite direction to another point. She stated that with at least five of the men participating she was ultimately forced to engage in fourteen or fifteen acts of "normal" intercourse, all without her consent. She specifically testified that defendant forced her to have intercourse with him. After approximately 4 1/2 hours, she and the other victim were allowed to leave, but were first warned by the men not to tell anyone about the incident. Before leaving the scene, she discovered that her wallet was missing and she later discovered that the contents of her automobile trunk, including the record albums had been removed. The girls then drove to West Florissant, Missouri, where they were stopped by a police officer whom they informed of the incident.

On cross-examination, she stated that she was not physically forced to follow the automobile with the other men in it on the night in question, nor did she try to escape or seek any assistance at any time preceding the incident although she had the opportunity to do so. She explained that she cooperated with the men's demands that evening because she was unsure of what would have happened had she not. She also testified that during the drive into Illinois, Knowles repeatedly grabbed at her, but that she hit him and refused his advances. She admitted that during their trip back to Missouri after the incident, she passed by several traveler's aid call boxes along the highway as well as one of the service stations at which they had stopped earlier that evening. She also related that their contact with the police after the incident was initiated by her being stopped for speeding. Defense counsel at one point confronted her with a statement she had given to Sergeant Newsome a few days after the incident in which she had said that three men had initially gotten into her car that evening, although she again stated that only two men had done so as she had testified on direct examination.

The other victim testified that shortly after arriving at Chouteau Island she was dragged from the automobile and knocked to the ground by Donald Jenkins. He asked her to undo her belt which she refused at first, but did so after he slapped her. Jenkins and several others at that point forced her to have sexual intercourse with them and to submit to acts of oral sex as well. She related that she was forced to lick one man's rectum twice and after she started shaking and telling them she was going to be sick, she was put back into the automobile where she was joined in the back seat by defendant Muellner and another man. She stated that Muellner forced her to have anal sex with him while in the automobile. After an unspecified period of time, the men left the automobile and the women were allowed to dress and drive away. Before leaving, one of the men remarked that they were "getting off easy." She described her companion as being hysterical during their trip back to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
18 cases
  • US ex rel. Potts v. Chrans, 87 C 417.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • 30 November 1988
    ...take part in the furtherance of a crime each is held accountable for the actions of the other. People v. Mueller, Muellner, 70 Ill.App.3d 671, 681-82 26 Ill.Dec. 850, 388 N.E.2d 851 (1979). Brief of Plaintiff-Appellee at The state relied on the accountability theory in its response to the i......
  • People v. Wagener
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • 1 June 2001
    ...not make the statement to which defendant refers. We were merely quoting from an appellate court case, People v. Muellner, 70 Ill.App.3d 671, 683, 26 Ill.Dec. 850, 388 N.E.2d 851 (1979), which had dealt with a different aspect of the statute under consideration. We did not adopt this ...
  • People v. Carney
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • 21 June 2001
    ...defendant's new 15year sentence circumvented the language of section 5-8-4(c) of the Code, we discussed People v. Muellner, 70 Ill.App.3d 671, 26 Ill.Dec. 850, 388 N.E.2d 851 (1979). Kilpatrick, 167 Ill.2d at 444, 212 Ill.Dec. 660, 657 N.E.2d 1005. In Muellner, defendant was convicted of tw......
  • People v. Crete
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • 20 June 1986
    ...358, 398 N.E.2d 33; People v. Knowles (1979), 76 Ill.App.3d 1004, 32 Ill.Dec. 476, 395 N.E.2d 706; People v. Muellner (1979), 70 Ill.App.3d 671, 26 Ill.Dec. 850, 388 N.E.2d 851; People v. Cornett (1975), 29 Ill.App.3d 244, 329 N.E.2d 922) are not in agreement on the question. We perceive no......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT