People v. Noia

CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division
Citation4 A.D.2d 698,163 N.Y.S.2d 796
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of New York, appellant, v. Charles NOIA, respondent.
Decision Date17 June 1957

Page 796

163 N.Y.S.2d 796
4 A.D.2d 698
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, appellant,
v.
Charles NOIA, respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
June 17, 1957.

Page 797

Maurice Edelbaum, New York City, for respondent, Frederick S. Abrams, New York City, on the brief.

William I. Siegel, Brooklyn, for appellant.

Before NOLAN, P. J., and BELDOCK, MURPHY, UGHETTA and KLEINFELD, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

Appeal from an order of the County Court, Kings County, granting, after a hearing, respondent's application to vacate a judgment of said court, rendered March 2, 1942, convicting him of murder in the first degree, with a recommendation of leniency. The application was made on the ground that respondent's conviction was procured in violation of the due process clause of the United States Constitution.

Order reversed on the law, and motion denied. The findings of fact below are affirmed.

It was error to vacate the judgment. The respondent's contentions with respect to the illegality of his conviction involve matters which could have been adequately reviewed on appeal from the judgment of conviction. No appeal was taken. This being so, the court was without authority to grant the application (People v. Sadness, 300 N.Y. 69, 89 N.E.2d 188; People v. Russo, 284 App.Div. 763, 135 N.Y.S.2d 475; People v. Palumbo, 282 App.Div. 1059, 126 N.Y.S.2d 381). This appeal is to be distinguished from People v. Caminito, 4 A.D.2d 697, 163 N.Y.S.2d 699, where appeals were taken to this court and to the Court of Appeals from the judgment of conviction, and where the facts as to the manner of procuring the confessions of his codefendants are dissimilar from those with respect to this respondent.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 practice notes
  • Presnell v. Kemp, No. 86-8369
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (11th Circuit)
    • 11 Enero 1988
    ...158 N.Y.S.2d 683 (1956), but the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court reversed, reinstating Noia's conviction. People v. Noia, 4 A.D.2d 698, 163 N.Y.S.2d 796 (1957). The New York Court of Appeals affirmed. People v. Caminito, 3 N.Y.2d 596, 170 N.Y.S.2d 799, 148 N.E.2d 139, cert.......
  • United States v. Fay, No. 308
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • 7 Febrero 1962
    ...(County Ct.1956). The State appealed to the Appellate Division, Second Department, where the decision of the County Court was reversed, 4 A.D.2d 698, 163 N. Y.S.2d 796 (1957). In a memorandum opinion the Appellate Division unanimously held: "It was error to vacate the judgment. The responde......
  • Fay v. Noia, No. 84
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • 18 Marzo 1963
    ...3 Misc.2d 447, 158 N.Y.S.2d 683 (1956). The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court reversed and reinstated the judgment of conviction, 4 A.D.2d 698, 163 N.Y.S.2d 796 (1957). The New York Court of Appeals affirmed the Appellate Division sub nom. People v. Caminito, 3 N.Y.2d 596, 170 N.Y.S.2......
  • United States v. Fay
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • 8 Abril 1960
    ...County Court of Kings County, People v. Noia, 3 Misc.2d 447, 158 N.Y.S.2d 683, was reversed by the Appellate Division, Second Department, 4 A.D.2d 698, 163 N.Y.S.2d 796, and affirmed by the Court of Appeals, People v. Caminito, 3 N.Y.2d 596, 170 N.Y.S. 2d 799, 148 N.E.2d 139. The Supreme Co......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • Presnell v. Kemp, No. 86-8369
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (11th Circuit)
    • 11 Enero 1988
    ...158 N.Y.S.2d 683 (1956), but the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court reversed, reinstating Noia's conviction. People v. Noia, 4 A.D.2d 698, 163 N.Y.S.2d 796 (1957). The New York Court of Appeals affirmed. People v. Caminito, 3 N.Y.2d 596, 170 N.Y.S.2d 799, 148 N.E.2d 139, cert.......
  • United States v. Fay, No. 308
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • 7 Febrero 1962
    ...(County Ct.1956). The State appealed to the Appellate Division, Second Department, where the decision of the County Court was reversed, 4 A.D.2d 698, 163 N. Y.S.2d 796 (1957). In a memorandum opinion the Appellate Division unanimously held: "It was error to vacate the judgment. The responde......
  • Fay v. Noia, No. 84
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • 18 Marzo 1963
    ...3 Misc.2d 447, 158 N.Y.S.2d 683 (1956). The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court reversed and reinstated the judgment of conviction, 4 A.D.2d 698, 163 N.Y.S.2d 796 (1957). The New York Court of Appeals affirmed the Appellate Division sub nom. People v. Caminito, 3 N.Y.2d 596, 170 N.Y.S.2......
  • United States v. Fay
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • 8 Abril 1960
    ...County Court of Kings County, People v. Noia, 3 Misc.2d 447, 158 N.Y.S.2d 683, was reversed by the Appellate Division, Second Department, 4 A.D.2d 698, 163 N.Y.S.2d 796, and affirmed by the Court of Appeals, People v. Caminito, 3 N.Y.2d 596, 170 N.Y.S. 2d 799, 148 N.E.2d 139. The Supreme Co......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT