People v. Oom, No. 346557
Decision Date | 17 September 2020 |
Docket Number | No. 346557 |
Parties | PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MAX HENRY OOM, Defendant-Appellant. |
Court | Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US |
If this opinion indicates that it is "FOR PUBLICATION," it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports.
UNPUBLISHED
Emmet Circuit Court
LC Nos. 17-004525-FH; 17-004621-FH
Before: REDFORD, P.J., and BECKERING and M. J. KELLY, JJ.
The trial court assigned 10 points to Offense Variable (OV) 14, MCL 777.44, which requires assessment of 10 points when the offender played a leadership role in a multiple offender situation where three or more offenders were involved. A multiple offender situation refers to "more than one person violating the law while part of a group." People v Dickinson, 321 Mich App 1, 22; 909 NW2d 24 (2017) (quotation marks and citation omitted). In People v Rhodes (On Remand), 305 Mich App 85, 90; 849 NW2d 417 (2014), quoting Random House Webster's College Dictionary (2001), this Court defined the term "leader" for purposes of scoring OV 14
This Court considered several important factors to determine whether a defendant held a leadership role when he or she committed a crime with another individual, including whether the defendant:
"Offense variables must be scored giving consideration to the sentencing offense alone, unless otherwise provided in the particular variable." People v McGraw, 484 Mich 120, 133; 771 NW2d 655 (2009). MCL 777.44(2)(a) specifically directs the sentencing court to consider "[t]he entire criminal transaction."
In this case, the trial court analyzed the evidence and concluded that both defendant and Jones were involved in selling MDMA to the CI, and that Jones served as a "conduit" in the transaction. Defendant's PSIR indicates that between October 30 and 31, 2017, defendant acted as a "source" to Jones before Jones sold MDMA to the CI, and that defendant then later sold MDMA to the CI directly. Assessment of points for OV 14 does not require that Jones was a codefendant or even charged to qualify as a multiple offender situation. See Dickinson, 321 Mich App at 22.
Defendant argues that he was not a leader in this situation. I disagree because the record reflects that evidence established several factors that, in this criminal transaction, defendant served as a necessary and senior member of the distribution chain and held a leadership role. A sentencing court may properly draw inferences...
To continue reading
Request your trial