People v. Ortiz

CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division
Writing for the CourtCLARK, J.
Citation148 A.D.3d 1291,48 N.Y.S.3d 834
Decision Date09 March 2017
Parties The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edwin E. ORTIZ, Appellant.

148 A.D.3d 1291
48 N.Y.S.3d 834

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent,
v.
Edwin E. ORTIZ, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

March 9, 2017.


48 N.Y.S.3d 835

M. Elizabeth Coreno, Saratoga Springs, for appellant.

Kelli P. McCoski, District Attorney, Fonda, for respondent.

Before: McCARTHY, J.P., EGAN JR., LYNCH, CLARK and MULVEY, JJ.

CLARK, J.

148 A.D.3d 1291

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Montgomery County (Catena, J.), rendered July 22, 2014, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of assault in the second degree.

Defendant waived indictment and pleaded guilty to assault

148 A.D.3d 1292

in the second degree as charged in a superior court information, and also waived his right to appeal. County Court thereafter imposed the agreed-upon prison sentence of three years, followed by three years of postrelease supervision, and ordered defendant to pay one of the victims restitution in the amount of $94,307.32. Defendant now appeals, and we affirm.

Initially, we are unpersuaded by defendant's assertion that his waiver of his

48 N.Y.S.3d 836

right to appeal was not knowing, intelligent and voluntary. County Court explained, and defendant communicated his understanding, that, in addition to the trial-related rights that he was forfeiting by pleading guilty, he was required to waive his right to appeal under the "particular plea agreement" that he was entering into. Defendant also signed a written waiver of appeal in open court, after having been afforded an opportunity to consult with counsel as to the terms of that written waiver, which expressly stated that defendant understood that, by waiving his right to appeal, he was "giving up rights beyond those that [he gave] up by entering a guilty plea." Accordingly, we find that defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v. Velazquez, 125 A.D.3d 1063, 1063, 3 N.Y.S.3d 193 [2015], lv. denied 25 N.Y.3d 993, 10 N.Y.S.3d 536, 32 N.E.3d 973 [2015] ; People v. Terrell, 123 A.D.3d 1341, 1341, 999 N.Y.S.2d 586 [2014], lv. denied 25 N.Y.3d 953, 7 N.Y.S.3d 283, 30 N.E.3d 174 [2015] ; People v. Baliraj, 101 A.D.3d 1175, 1176, 954 N.Y.S.2d 711 [2012], lv. denied 21 N.Y.3d 941, 968 N.Y.S.2d 3, 990 N.E.2d 137 [2013] ). Consequently, the valid appeal waiver precludes defendant's challenge to the sentence as harsh and excessive (see People v. Belile, 137 A.D.3d 1460, 1461, 27 N.Y.S.3d 738 [2016] ; People v. Neiles, 128 A.D.3d 1179, 1180, 7 N.Y.S.3d 913 [2015] ; People v. Banks, 122 A.D.3d 953, 954, 994 N.Y.S.2d 470 [2014], lv. denied 26 N.Y.3d 925, 17 N.Y.S.3d 88, 38 N.E.3d 834 [2015] ).

Defendant further challenges the amount of restitution awarded to one of the victims, an issue that defendant preserved by participating in the restitution hearing and contesting the amount imposed at the time of sentencing (see People v. Ford, 77 A.D.3d 1176, 1176, 910 N.Y.S.2d 235 [2010], lv. denied 17 N.Y.3d 816, 929 N.Y.S.2d 805, 954 N.E.2d 96 [2011] ; compare People v. Hakkenberg, 142 A.D.3d 1251, 1252, 37 N.Y.S.3d 918 [2016], lv. denied 28 N.Y.3d 1072, 47 N.Y.S.3d 231, 69 N.E.3d 1027 [2016] ; People v. Miller, 137 A.D.3d 1485, 1486, 29 N.Y.S.3d 586 [2016] ), and that is not precluded by the valid appeal waiver since the underlying plea agreement did not specify the amount of restitution to be awarded (see People v. Brasmeister, 136 A.D.3d 1122, 1123, 25 N.Y.S.3d 694 [2016], lv. denied 27 N.Y.3d 993, 38 N.Y.S.3d 103, 59 N.E.3d 1215 [2016] ; People v. Gardner, 129 A.D.3d 1386, 1388, 12 N.Y.S.3d 353 [2015] ; People v. Smith, 100 A.D.3d 1102, 1102, 953 N.Y.S.2d 377 [2012] ). "In seeking restitution, the People bore the burden of demonstrating the amount of the victim's out-of-pocket losses by a preponderance of the evidence. The amount gained by defendant or taken

from the victim must be offset against the value of any benefit that may have been conferred upon the victim, and the People must show both components of the restitution equation, the amount taken minus the benefit conferred" (People v. Decker, 139 A.D.3d 1113, 1117–1118, 30 N.Y.S.3d 751 [2016] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted], lv. denied 28 N.Y.3d 928, 40 N.Y.S.3d 357, 63 N.E.3d 77 [2016] ; accord People v. Johnson, 91 A.D.3d 1121, 1123, 936 N.Y.S.2d 748 [2012], lv. denied 18 N.Y.3d 959, 944 N.Y.S.2d 487, 967 N.E.2d 712 [2012] ; see Penal Law § 60.27[2] ; CPL 400.30[4] ; People v. Tzitzikalakis, 8 N.Y.3d 217, 221–222, 832 N.Y.S.2d 120, 864 N.E.2d 44 [2007] ).

In our view, the evidence presented at the hearing—which included the bills that the victim received for the medical services rendered to him as a result of his injuries inflicted by defendant—was sufficient to satisfy the People's burden of

...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 practice notes
  • People v. Rogers, 108775
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • January 4, 2018
    ...were legitimate does not constitute such evidence. County Court properly determined the amount of the award (see People v. Ortiz, 148 A.D.3d 1291, 1293, 48 N.Y.S.3d 834 [2017]; People v. Stevens, 84 A.D.3d 1424, 1427, 922 N.Y.S.2d 596 [2011], lv denied 17 N.Y.3d 822, 929 N.Y.S.2d 811, 954 N......
  • People v. Baber, 110046
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • April 16, 2020
    ...assault; as such, they were properly recoverable" ( People v. Kise, 248 A.D.2d 818, 819, 670 N.Y.S.2d 238 [1998] ; see People v. Ortiz, 148 A.D.3d 1291, 1292–1293, 48 N.Y.S.3d 834 [2017] ; People v. Pump, 67 A.D.3d 1041, 1042, 889 N.Y.S.2d 105 [2009], lv denied 13 N.Y.3d 941, 895 N.Y.S.2d 3......
  • People v. Hunter, 107974
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • September 12, 2019
    ...1104 [2011] ). Defendant's challenge to the amount of the restitution award similarly survives his appeal waiver (see People v. Ortiz, 148 A.D.3d 1291, 1292, 48 N.Y.S.3d 834 [2017] ; People v. Gardner, 129 A.D.3d 1386, 1388, 12 N.Y.S.3d 353 [2015] ), but is unpreserved given his failure to ......
  • People v. Drake, 109994
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • January 9, 2020
    ...1601, 1604, 108 N.Y.S.3d 527 [2019] ; People v. Mahon, 148 A.D.3d 1303, 1304, 48 N.Y.S.3d 842 [2017] ; 117 N.Y.S.3d 356 People v. Ortiz, 148 A.D.3d 1291, 1292, 48 N.Y.S.3d 834 [2017] ). Nevertheless, this issue is also unpreserved, as defendant did not request a restitution hearing and ulti......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
  • People v. Rogers, 108775
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • January 4, 2018
    ...were legitimate does not constitute such evidence. County Court properly determined the amount of the award (see People v. Ortiz, 148 A.D.3d 1291, 1293, 48 N.Y.S.3d 834 [2017]; People v. Stevens, 84 A.D.3d 1424, 1427, 922 N.Y.S.2d 596 [2011], lv denied 17 N.Y.3d 822, 929 N.Y.S.2d 811, 954 N......
  • People v. Baber, 110046
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • April 16, 2020
    ...assault; as such, they were properly recoverable" ( People v. Kise, 248 A.D.2d 818, 819, 670 N.Y.S.2d 238 [1998] ; see People v. Ortiz, 148 A.D.3d 1291, 1292–1293, 48 N.Y.S.3d 834 [2017] ; People v. Pump, 67 A.D.3d 1041, 1042, 889 N.Y.S.2d 105 [2009], lv denied 13 N.Y.3d 941, 895 N.Y.S.2d 3......
  • People v. Hunter, 107974
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • September 12, 2019
    ...1104 [2011] ). Defendant's challenge to the amount of the restitution award similarly survives his appeal waiver (see People v. Ortiz, 148 A.D.3d 1291, 1292, 48 N.Y.S.3d 834 [2017] ; People v. Gardner, 129 A.D.3d 1386, 1388, 12 N.Y.S.3d 353 [2015] ), but is unpreserved given his failure to ......
  • People v. Drake, 109994
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • January 9, 2020
    ...1601, 1604, 108 N.Y.S.3d 527 [2019] ; People v. Mahon, 148 A.D.3d 1303, 1304, 48 N.Y.S.3d 842 [2017] ; 117 N.Y.S.3d 356 People v. Ortiz, 148 A.D.3d 1291, 1292, 48 N.Y.S.3d 834 [2017] ). Nevertheless, this issue is also unpreserved, as defendant did not request a restitution hearing and ulti......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT