People v. Pacifico
Decision Date | 02 October 1980 |
Citation | 432 N.Y.S.2d 588,105 Misc.2d 396 |
Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of New York v. Joseph PACIFICO, Defendant. |
Court | New York City Court |
John J. Santucci, Dist. Atty., Queens County, Kew Gardens, Ralph J. Vecchio, Deputy Commissioner and Counsel, Dept. of Taxation and Finance, New York City, for the People; Ira I. Schreiber, Asst. Dist. Atty., Kew Gardens, Deborah Dwyer, Associate Director, New York City, of counsel.
Ernest H. Hammer, New York City, for defendant.
This case is before this Court for decision on defendant's motion to dismiss the accusatory instrument filed herein pursuant to Sections 100.15, 100.40, and 170.35 of the Criminal Procedure Law for failure to allege "a necessary element of the offense charged."
The defendant, Joseph Pacifico, is before the Court on a misdemeanor information, sworn to on May 21, 1980, by Investigator J. Anzalone of New York State Tax Department, alleging that:
When the statute is read together with the complaint, the People contend that the defendant is adequately apprised of the charge against him.
Both sides concede that the cigarettes in question bore New Jersey tax stamps. The defendant asserts, and the People do not at this juncture offer contradictory evidence, that the cigarettes were destined for consumption in New Jersey.
An information must demonstrate reasonable cause to believe that the defendant committed the offense charged and must also establish a legally sufficient case against the defendant. People v. Crisofulli, 91 Misc.2d 424, 398 N.Y.S.2d 120 (N.Y.C. Criminal Court, N.Y.Co., 1977). In order to be sufficient on its face, the information must be subscribed and verified by a "complainant" having knowledge of the offense charged. The accusatory part of the information must designate the offense charged. The factual part of the information must allege facts of an evidentiary character, must provide reasonable cause to believe the defendant committed the offense charged, and must, if true, establish every element of the offense charged and the defendant's commission of it. Secs. 100.15 and 100.40 CPL.
An accusatory instrument is defective on its face when it does not conform to the requirements of Sec. 100.40 CPL. However, the instrument may not be dismissed as defective, but must be amended where the defect or irregularity is of a kind that may be cured by amendment, and the People move to so amend. Sec. 170.35(1)(a) CPL. (The People, in their opposing papers, have expressed a willingness to amend should the Court find the information to be defective.)
Art. 20 Sec. 481.2 states in pertinent part:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Rossi
...People v. Sokoloff, 144 Misc.2d 68, 542 N.Y.S.2d 915 (permitting amendment of insufficient supporting deposition); People v. Pacifico, 105 Misc.2d 396, 432 N.Y.S.2d 588 (same). The Court may not grant an adjournment to allow the people to furnish a supporting deposition after the 30-day dea......
-
People v. Abajian
...informations and other accusatory instruments." People v. Twine, supra, at 767, 468 N.Y.S.2d 559; see also, People v. Pacifico, 105 Misc.2d 396, 432 N.Y.S.2d 588 (Qu.Crim.Ct.1980). Consistently with these cases, People v. Engeman, 135 Misc.2d 228, 230, 514 N.Y.S.2d 588 (Long Beach City Ct.1......
-
People v. Matozzo
...v. Casey, supra .; People v. Penn Central Railroad Co. 95 Misc.2d 748, 417 N.Y.S.2d 822 (Crim.Ct. Kings Co.1978) ; People v. Pacifico, 105 Misc.2d 396, 432 N.Y.S.2d 588 (Crim.Ct. Queens Co.1980), the People have failed to demonstrate their ability to so cure the defects herein. While the Pe......
-
People v. Matozzo
...v. Casey, supra.; People v. Penn Central Railroad Co. 95 Misc 2d 748, 417 N.Y.S.2d 822 (Crim.Ct. Kings Co.1978); People v. Pacifico, 105 Misc 2d 396, 432 N.Y.S.2d 588 (Crim.Ct. Queens Co. 1980), the People have failed to demonstrate their ability to so cure the defects herein. While the Peo......