People v. Patterson

Docket Number115102
Decision Date17 October 2014

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
139 cases
  • State v. Houston-Sconiers
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • November 24, 2015
    ...judicial discretion in determining the appropriate setting for the proceedings in these juvenile cases.People v. Patterson, 2014 IL 115102, 25 N.E.3d 526, 553, 388 Ill.Dec. 834 [ (2014) ], reh'g denied (Jan. 26, 2015) (internal citations omitted).¶ 17 Unlike the defendants in Roper, Graham,......
  • State v. B.T.D.
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • May 24, 2019
    ...interest in juvenile-court adjudication, at least two state supreme courts have rejected that proposition.In People v. Patterson, 388 Ill.Dec. 834, 25 N.E.3d 526 (Ill. 2014), the Illinois Supreme Court stated:"We first address defendant's due process claim. As both parties recognize, this c......
  • People v. Joiner
    • United States
    • Appellate Court of Illinois
    • March 30, 2018
    ...uphold a statute whenever reasonably possible, resolving all doubts in favor of the statute's validity. People v. Patterson , 2014 IL 115102, ¶ 90, 388 Ill.Dec. 834, 25 N.E.3d 526. In addition, the challenging party has the burden of rebutting this presumption. People v. Willis , 2013 IL Ap......
  • People v. Franklin
    • United States
    • Appellate Court of Illinois
    • September 30, 2020
    ...death sentences that are shared by no other sentences." Graham , 560 U.S. at 69, 130 S.Ct. 2011. See also People v. Patterson , 2014 IL 115102, ¶ 108, 388 Ill.Dec. 834, 25 N.E.3d 526 (the death penalty is unique and shares characteristics with no other sentence "besides life without parole"......
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • The Miller Revolution
    • United States
    • Iowa Law Review No. 101-5, July 2016
    • July 1, 2016
    ...J.L. & GENDER 989, 992 (2013) (arguing that existing waiver procedures violate Due Process). 245. But see People v. Patterson, 25 N.E.3d 526, 553 (Ill. 2014) (rejecting an Eighth Amendment challenge to a mandatory transfer law based on Miller ). 246. See supra notes 212–19 and accompany......
  • The Miller Trilogy and the Persistence of Extreme Juvenile Sentences
    • United States
    • American Criminal Law Review No. 58-4, October 2021
    • October 1, 2021
    ...mitigation through information sharing is inherently only available to high-level drug traff‌ickers). 54. See, e.g., People v. Patterson, 25 N.E.3d 526, 553 (Ill. 2014) (“[W]e strongly urge the General Assembly to review the automatic transfer provision based on the current scientif‌ic and ......
  • DISRUPTING INJUSTICE: FIFTY YEARS POST MIRANDA AND GAULT: A CALL TO ACTION TO RE-EXAMINE THE RIGHTS OF CHILDREN IN CONFLICT WITH THE LAW.
    • United States
    • South Dakota Law Review Vol. 62 No. 3, September 2017
    • September 22, 2017
    ...Confession Capital, 60 MINUTES (Dec. 9, 2012), www.cbsnews.com/news/chicago-the-false-confession-capital/. (109.) People v. Patterson, 25 N.E.3d 526, 545 (Ill. 2014). The Illinois Supreme Court has held that "deception is not per se unlawful." Id. The Court further noted that the "use of de......