People v. Patterson
| Decision Date | 21 December 1971 |
| Docket Number | Gen. No. 70--165 |
| Citation | 276 N.E.2d 354,2 Ill.App.3d 902 |
| Parties | PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph Wayne PATTERSON, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | United States Appellate Court of Illinois |
Appeal from the 18th Judicial Circuit, Du Page County; William J. Bauer, Judge.
SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION
The conviction in this case was affirmed, Ill., 274 N.E.2d 467, and we remanded the case to the Trial Court to conduct a hearing under the provisions of the 'Cannabis Control Act' and report back to this court its findings within a short date.
Now, however, in view of The People v. McCabe, Supreme Court Docket #42674, filed Oct. 15, 1971, rehearing denied November 24, 1971, 49 Ill.2d 338, 275 N.E.2d 407 (1971), and The People v. Hudson, Supreme Court Docket #43994, Ill., 276 N.E.2d 345, there is no necessity for a hearing under the 'Cannabis Control Act.'
Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is reversed.
Judgment reversed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Smith
...burden and would not assure a fairer trial of the accused (People v. Patterson, 2 Ill.App.3d 902, 274 N.E.2d 467, supplemented 2 Ill.App.3d 902, 276 N.E.2d 354). In the instant case Dr. Edward V. Ferguson testified that after a slug was removed from the body of Louis Knowles, 'that it was g......
-
People v. Manley
... ... See also People v. Colletti (1968), 101 Ill.App.2d 51, 58, 242 N.E.2d 63; [19 Ill.App.3d 369] People v. Lentz (1972), 8 Ill.App.3d 41, 43--44, 288 N.E.2d 653); and police officers have no duty to reduce all investigative findings to writing. (People v. Patterson (1971), 274 N.E.2d 467, 472, Supplemental Opinion, 276 N.E.2d 354). By analogy, it is concluded that the State is under no duty to record or otherwise reduce to writing the substance of an oral statement of a witness or the substance of an interview with a witness that he intends to call at trial ... ...
-
People v. Kristovich
...impose an unnecessary burden, and would not assure a fairer trial of the accused. People v. Patterson, 2 Ill.App.3d 902, 274 N.E.2d 467, 276 N.E.2d 354; People v. Judkins, 10 Ill.2d 445, 140 N.E.2d In the case at bar each of those exhibits (the clothing in the plastic bag, the extended, ben......