People v. Payton
| Decision Date | 18 September 2013 |
| Citation | 109 A.D.3d 940,2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 05922,971 N.Y.S.2d 462 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Gilda PAYTON, appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
James D. Licata, New City, N.Y. (Lois Cappelletti of counsel), for appellant.
Thomas P. Zugibe, District Attorney, New City, N.Y. (Itamar J. Yeger of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Alfieri, J.), rendered June 18, 2012, convicting her of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
At the plea allocution, the County Court sufficiently advised the defendant of the nature of the right to appeal, and the record establishes that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived that right. Thus, although the Rockland County pre-printed form waiver of the right to appeal signed by the defendant contained erroneous statements with regard to the waiver of the right to appeal ( see People v. Edmunson, 109 A.D.3d 621, 970 N.Y.S.2d 635 [2d Dept.2013] ), the defendant's waiver of her right to appeal was valid ( see id.;People v. Pelaez, 100 A.D.3d 803, 804, 954 N.Y.S.2d 554). Accordingly, review of the defendant's contention that the sentence imposed was excessive is precluded ( see People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645;People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 255, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Batista
...demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (compare People v. Payton, 109 A.D.3d 940, 971 N.Y.S.2d 462, People v. Mizhirumbay–Guaman, 109 A.D.3d 668, 668–669, 970 N.Y.S.2d 876, and People v. Edmunson, 109 A.D.3d 621, 622, 970 N.Y.S.2......
-
Chia v. City of N.Y.
...not properly before this Court ( see [109 A.D.3d 867]Tokio Mar. Fire Ins. Co. v. Abdor–Florida, Inc., 35 A.D.3d 724, 824 N.Y.S.2d 907; [971 N.Y.S.2d 462]Matter of Matarrese v. New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 247 A.D.2d 475, 668 N.Y.S.2d 686).ANGIOLILLO, J.P., CHAMBERS, SGROI and COHEN,......
- People v. Vega
-
People v. Tovar
...with regard to the waiver of the right to appeal (see People v. Batista, 167 A.D.3d 69, 75, 86 N.Y.S.3d 492 ; see also People v. Payton, 109 A.D.3d 940, 971 N.Y.S.2d 462 ; People v. Mizhirumbay–Guaman, 109 A.D.3d 668, 970 N.Y.S.2d 876 ), under the circumstances of this case, we conclude tha......