People v. Peters

Decision Date05 August 1998
Citation680 N.Y.S.2d 67,92 N.Y.2d 903
Parties, 702 N.E.2d 852 People v. Bernard Peters
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Ciparick, J.

--- A.D.2d ----, 671 N.Y.S.2d 387

App.Div. 4, Onondaga 4/29/98

Denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • People v. Rodriguez
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 17 Junio 2021
  • People v. Hooper
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 9 Noviembre 2001
    ... ... We reject defendant's further contention that the preservation requirements of the Criminal Procedure Law are unconstitutional (see, People v Mike, 283 A.D.2d 989, lv denied 96 N.Y.2d 904; People v Peters, 249 A.D.2d 987, 988, lv denied 92 N.Y.2d 903). We conclude that defendant received meaningful representation (see, People v Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 147) and that she was not denied a fair trial because of alleged cumulative error. (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Fahey, J. - ... ...
  • People v. Mike, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDEN
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 2 Mayo 2001
    ... ... We reject defendant's contention that the preservation requirements of the Criminal Procedure Law are unconstitutional (see, People v Peters, 249 A.D.2d 987, 988, lv denied 92 N.Y.2d 903). Finally, we conclude that Supreme Court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress identification testimony by the victim. The victim previously knew defendant, and thus the identification was merely confirmatory (see, People v Thomas, 272 ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT