People v. Peters
Decision Date | 05 August 1998 |
Citation | 680 N.Y.S.2d 67,92 N.Y.2d 903 |
Parties | , 702 N.E.2d 852 People v. Bernard Peters |
Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
To continue reading
Request your trial3 cases
- People v. Rodriguez
-
People v. Hooper
... ... We reject defendant's further contention that the preservation requirements of the Criminal Procedure Law are unconstitutional (see, People v Mike, 283 A.D.2d 989, lv denied 96 N.Y.2d 904; People v Peters, 249 A.D.2d 987, 988, lv denied 92 N.Y.2d 903). We conclude that defendant received meaningful representation (see, People v Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 147) and that she was not denied a fair trial because of alleged cumulative error. (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Fahey, J. - ... ...
-
People v. Mike, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDEN
... ... We reject defendant's contention that the preservation requirements of the Criminal Procedure Law are unconstitutional (see, People v Peters, 249 A.D.2d 987, 988, lv denied 92 N.Y.2d 903). Finally, we conclude that Supreme Court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress identification testimony by the victim. The victim previously knew defendant, and thus the identification was merely confirmatory (see, People v Thomas, 272 ... ...