People v. Phiefer
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | BREITEL |
| Citation | People v. Phiefer, 43 N.Y.2d 719, 401 N.Y.S.2d 483 (N.Y. 1977) |
| Decision Date | 21 November 1977 |
| Parties | , 372 N.E.2d 323 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Arthur PHIEFER, Appellant. |
The order of the Appellate Division is affirmed.
Appellant, convicted of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree (Penal Law, § 265.01), argues that, as a matter of law, the evidence presented by the People was legally insufficient to establish his guilt.
The record discloses that the police received a complaint from one William Morrison that appellant had threatened to shoot him. Responding to this complaint, three officers proceeded to appellant's residence. After identifying themselves as police officers to appellant, the officers were permitted to enter the premises. As one of the officers followed the appellant into the kitchen, he observed a revolver in plain view on the bed in the adjacent bedroom. He seized the weapon and arrested appellant. Shortly after the arrest, appellant admitted residing at the premises. Later he claimed to reside elsewhere. At trial, appellant's girl friend, who also resided at the same address and who was present during the search, denied ever having seen the weapon before.
Under our limited powers to review affirmed findings of fact, and viewing the evidence, after a conviction, most favorably to the prosecution (People v. Cerullo, 18 N.Y.2d 839, 841, 275 N.Y.S.2d 845, 847, 222 N.E.2d 605, 607), we conclude there was sufficient evidence for the trier of the facts to establish that appellant exercised dominion...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
People v. Gonzalez
...706, 507 N.E.2d 299 (1987); People v. Murphy, 55 N.Y.2d 819, 447 N.Y.S.2d 437, 432 N.E.2d 140 (1981); People v. Phiefer, 43 N.Y.2d 719, 401 N.Y.S.2d 483, 372 N.E.2d 323 (1977); Compare People v. Harris, 72 N.Y.2d 614, 616, 536 N.Y.S.2d 1, 532 N.E.2d 1229 (1988); rev'd sub nom. New York v. H......
-
Com. v. Harmond
...563 F.2d 936, 938-939 (8th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1021, 98 S.Ct. 746, 54 L.Ed.2d 768 (1978); People v. Phiefer, 43 N.Y.2d 719, 721, 401 N.Y.S.2d 483, 372 N.E.2d 323 (1977). Finally, knowledge that a search will inevitably produce incriminating evidence does not automatically pre......
-
People v. Sanders
...or had committed the offense. (Cf. People v. Williams, 43 N.Y.2d 725, 401 N.Y.S.2d 487, 372 N.E.2d 328; People v. Phiefer, 43 N.Y.2d 719, 401 N.Y.S.2d 483, 372 N.E.2d 323.) Nothing more is required to establish probable cause justifying a warrantless arrest. (See, e. g., Henry v. United Sta......
-
People v. Pearson
...632, 450 N.Y.S.2d 784, 436 N.E.2d 190; People v. Robertson, 48 N.Y.2d 993, 425 N.Y.S.2d 545, 401 N.E.2d 903; People v. Phiefer, 43 N.Y.2d 719, 401 N.Y.S.2d 483, 372 N.E.2d 323). Nor was there proof that defendant was involved in any drug selling or other operation being conducted there (com......