People v. Polk

Decision Date09 May 1986
Docket NumberNo. 84-0004,84-0004
Citation97 Ill.Dec. 819,493 N.E.2d 626,143 Ill.App.3d 698
Parties, 97 Ill.Dec. 819 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bernard POLK and Albert Cox, Defendants-Appellants.
CourtUnited States Appellate Court of Illinois

James J. Doherty, Public Defender, of Cook County, Chicago, (Donald L. Bertell, Ass't Public Defender, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.

Richard M. Daley, State's Atty., County of Cook, Chicago, (Michael E. Shabat, Patrick J. Foley, Ass't St. Attys. of counsel), for defendants-appellants.

Justice LORENZ delivered the opinion of the court:

Following a jury trial defendants Bernard Polk and Albert Cox were convicted of murder and aggravated kidnapping. Both defendants received concurrent prison terms of 25 years for murder and 20 years for aggravated kidnapping. On appeal defendants contend: (1) a pretrial identification of the defendants was conducted under such suggestive circumstances as to render that identification and subsequent in-court identifications unreliable; (2) it was reversible error for the trial court to refuse to accept a defense instruction concerning the credibility of drug addicts; (3) the failure of defendants' trial counsel to move to quash defendants' arrests denied them due process of law and constituted ineffective assistance of counsel.

We affirm.

At trial the following pertinent evidence was introduced. Victoria Green testified that on July 18, 1982, she was living in a third-floor apartment at 914 St. Charles, Maywood, with her brother, Peter Green, and Guy McCoats, the victim. At about noon a tan car pulled up and two men emerged. At the time Victoria did not know who they were, although she had seen Cox once at a store. In court she identified them as the defendants. Both men came upstairs to her apartment door with defendant Cox holding an 18- to 24-inch pipe. As Victoria stood outside her door Guy McCoats approached and asked the defendants if they wanted to see him. They said yes and all three men entered the apartment, leaving Victoria outside. Victoria then heard a gunshot from inside the apartment where she telephoned the police. From that apartment she saw the defendants getting into their car with McCoats. Before they drove away she heard defendant Cox say that McCoats would not be seen alive again if anybody reported this.

The police arrived 45 to 60 minutes later (Victoria had told them to come over without reporting what had happened). As Victoria was telling them what she had seen defendant Cox returned to the scene. Victoria pointed him out to the police, who arrested him. Trial testimony from other witnesses established that Cox was released later that afternoon because the police did not initially find any witnesses to corroborate Victoria's account. At about 3:00 p.m. Victoria again spoke to the police and drove through the neighborhood with them in search of McCoats, accompanied by Peter Green.

McCoats' body was found in a forest preserve at about 4:00 p.m. He had been shot three times in the head and once in the chest. The defendants were arrested some time after 6:00 p.m. Victoria testified that later that evening she viewed a lineup and identified both defendants as the men she had seen abduct McCoats. However two officers who were present at the lineup testified she only identified Cox.

Peter Green testified that he was sleeping on a couch inside their studio apartment when a slamming door awakened him. He saw McCoats and two other men, identified by him in court as the defendants. Defendant Cox was holding an 18-inch pipe. The defendants began arguing with McCoats, with Cox asking McCoats "Where is my dope at." McCoats said he did not have it. Cox then struck McCoats about the head and shoulders with the pipe. The men began fighting and defendant Polk pulled out a gun and shot toward the ceiling. Defendants grabbed McCoats in a headlock and moved toward the door. Polk asked Peter if he had eight dollars. When Peter said he did not, Polk told him he should get the money if he wanted to see McCoats alive.

According to Peter the defendants then dragged McCoats downstairs and put him in a light brown car. Polk yelled out that McCoats would be freed for eight dollars, also threatening that McCoats would not be seen again if anybody told what had happened. They then drove off with McCoats.

Peter admitted that when the police arrived at 1:15 or 1:30 p.m. he did not tell them what he had seen. He did tell the police at 3:30 what had happened, and when he viewed the lineup that evening he identified the two defendants.

Brenda Williams, who lived in the same building as the Greens, testified that between 12 and 12:30 p.m. on the occurrence date she saw Guy McCoats going up to the third floor with two men. One of those men had a 15- to 18-inch pipe in his hand. She also noticed a brown and beige Buick in the parking lot. After walking to a nearby store and buying some wine she went to a park. She then saw the same car, containing McCoats and the two men, drive toward the forest preserve.

Cheryl Davis testified that in the early evening the day before the occurrence she bought a "one-and-one" (a street drug composed of Talwin and Pyribenzamine, also known as T's and Blues) from defendant Polk for eight dollars in a second-floor apartment at 15th and Railroad in Maywood. She could hear the voice of defendant Cox in another room of the apartment. Guy McCoats then entered and obtained the same drug from Polk. However, McCoats did not have the eight dollars. When Polk told him he had better give him the money McCoats ran down the stairs, saying he would pay that night or the next day. Polk followed him down, saying, "You will see I don't take that s---. You are going to give me my eight dollars. You'll see."

Davis returned to the same apartment that evening. Defendant Polk was there alone, armed with a gun. He told her to tell McCoats if he did not pay he would come over there at noon and kill him. Later that evening Davis told McCoats this.

Davis further testified that at noon the next day, while standing on a third-floor balcony at 914 St. Charles, she saw the defendants exiting a yellowish-tan Buick that she recognized as belonging to Cox. Cox was carrying an 18- to 24-inch pipe. When Davis saw them going to the Greens' apartment she ran to the outside of that door. She heard McCoats screaming and pleading with the defendants and then heard a shot. The defendants brought McCoats out and put him in their car. McCoats unsuccessfully asked people on the scene for eight dollars. When a bystander produced less than that it was refused. Cox stated that without eight dollars McCoats would not be seen again. Polk stated that a call to the police would also mean McCoats would not be seen again.

On cross-examination Davis admitted that the day of her testimony was the first time she had told any official what had happened. She explained that she had been afraid of the defendants. Davis, who had previously been convicted for misdemeanor theft, admitted that she was, at the time of trial, in the custody of Du Page County on pending theft charges. She denied that the prosecutors had promised to inform the Du Page prosecutors of her cooperation. However, it was stipulated at trial that if called to testify, Assistant State's Attorney William Walters would state that prior to her testimony Davis was told that the Du Page prosecutors would be informed that she had testified for the prosecution in a murder trial.

Davis also admitted that she had formerly used narcotics (T's and Blues) for two or three years, but denied being an addict, stating that during that period she "got high maybe twice a week." She took that drug orally, not by injection. She denied using heroin, but stated that she had used cocaine and had injected that drug four or five times. She stated that a line-shaped scar on the back of her left hand was the result of these cocaine injections. She also admitted that she occasionally stole to get money for cocaine.

Davis denied having used any narcotics on the day she witnessed the abduction. She admitted to having taken T's and Blues on the two occasions she saw defendant Polk the evening before (actually by her testimony the second occasion was at 1:30 or 2:00 a.m. on the morning of the abduction). However she also testified that the effects of this drug lasted for only an hour.

Maywood police officer Charles Gunn confirmed that when he first spoke to Victoria and Peter Green at about 1:20 p.m. at the apartment building Victoria told him what she had seen, but Peter told him he knew nothing about it. At that time Brenda Williams and Cheryl Davis also denied any knowledge of the incident with Davis saying she did not wish to get involved. However the second time Gunn spoke to Peter, at about 3:00 p.m., he did receive information about the incident.

Officer Gunn also testified that defendant Cox's car was located at about 2:30 a.m. the day after the incident. No blood was found in the car. However it was established at trial that a box of .38 Special bullets was recovered from the trunk of the car. It was stipulated that if called to testify a forensic scientist who examined the four bullets recovered from the victim would testify that they were the same caliber as those recovered from the car.

Defendant Cox took the stand and denied knowing the victim, Cheryl Davis, Vicky Green, or Peter Green. At the time of the occurrence he lived at 6 South 15th Avenue in Maywood (located five minutes by car from the victim's apartment). He testified that from 5:00 p.m. the day before the occurrence he was at the apartment of a friend on the west side of Chicago. He returned to his apartment at 10:00 a.m. the next day, leaving at noon to go to the apartment of a neighbor, Dorothy Harris, to use the phone. He remained on the phone for half an hour, spoke to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • People v. Seawright
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • 15 Mayo 1992
    ...of whether to give an IPI or a non-IPI instruction rests within the sound discretion of the trial judge. (People v. Polk (1986), 143 Ill.App.3d 698, 97 Ill.Dec. 819, 493 N.E.2d 626.) Refusal to give a tendered non-IPI instruction is an abuse of discretion only when it results in the jury no......
  • People v. Hominick
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • 1 Diciembre 1988
    ...of whether to give a non-IPI instruction rests within the sound discretion of the trial judge (People v. Polk (1986), 143 Ill.App.3d 698, 97 Ill.Dec. 819, 493 N.E.2d 626), and a trial court may properly refuse a defendant's proposed jury instruction when there is no evidence supporting the ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT