People v. Pouncy
| Decision Date | 29 July 2008 |
| Docket Number | COA No. 269298.,Docket No. 136202. |
| Citation | 753 N.W.2d 187,482 Mich. 895 |
| Parties | PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Omar Rashad POUNCY, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 25, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
Pouncy v. Macauley
...denied Pouncy's application because it was not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed. See People v. Pouncy , 482 Mich. 895, 753 N.W.2d 187 (Mich. 2008) (Table).Pouncy thereafter filed a motion for relief from judgment in the state trial court that raised several addition......
-
Pouncy v. Palmer
...to represent himself in that case. Id. at *30–32, 35. The Michigan Supreme Court denied Pouncy leave to appeal. People v. Pouncy , 482 Mich. 895, 753 N.W.2d 187, 187–88 (2008) (mem.).In 2009, Pouncy filed a counseled motion for relief from judgment containing several constitutional claims, ......
-
Pouncy v. Palmer
...for failing to raise a futile defense.Id. at *17.The Michigan Supreme Court declined to hear Pouncy's appeal. See People v. Pouncy , 482 Mich. 895, 753 N.W.2d 187 (2008).At the conclusion of his direct appeal, Pouncy filed a motion for relief from judgment with the trial court, and in that ......