People v. Prunty
| Docket Number | S210234 |
| Decision Date | 27 August 2015 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
18 cases
-
People v. Gomez
... ... 1181, 24 Cal.Rptr.3d 112, 105 P.3d 487 ) in the "absence of patent falsity, inherent improbability, or other reason to question [the testimony's] validity" ( People v. Prunty (2015) 62 Cal.4th 59, 90, 192 Cal.Rptr.3d 309, 355 P.3d 480 ). Despite the various reasons for discounting Witness No. 1's credibility and the minor conflicts between Witness No. 1's and Witness No. 3's testimony, sufficient evidence supported the jury's determination of guilt. Patel's body was ... ...
-
People v. Cornejo
... ... Following oral argument, our Supreme Court decided 197 Cal.Rptr.3d 694 People v. Prunty (2015) 62 Cal.4th 59, 192 Cal.Rptr.3d 309, 355 P.3d 480 ( Prunty ), which squarely addresses the first contention listed above. We requested supplemental briefing on the new case. Having reviewed this briefing, we conclude Prunty requires reversal of the gang enhancement findings (§ 186.22, ... ...
-
Gonzales v. Cal. Victim Comp. Bd.
... 316 Cal. Rptr. 3d 757 Joshua Zamora GONZALES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA VICTIM COMPENSATION BOARD, Defendant and Respondent; People of the State of California, Real Party in Interest. B323360 Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2. Filed December 29, 2023 316 Cal. Rptr. 3d ... Prunty (2015) 62 Cal.4th 59, 89, 192 Cal.Rptr.3d 309, 355 P.3d 480 (conc. & dis. opn. of Cantil-Sakauye, C.J.)). Such deference is accorded to these ... ...
-
People v. Guenther
... ... ) As with our review of the jury instructions, we consider questions of statutory interpretation de novo. ( People v. Prunty (2015) 62 Cal.4th 59, 71, 192 Cal. Rptr.3d 309, 355 P.3d 480.) [10] For our purposes, the same statutory analysis applies to the sodomy and oral copulation statutes, which, but for the distinct physical acts, describe identical violations accomplished by identical means. (See People v. Hale ... ...
Get Started for Free
