People v. Prunty
| Docket Number | S210234 |
| Decision Date | 27 August 2015 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
18 cases
-
People v. Gomez
...of patent falsity, inherent improbability, or other reason to question [the testimony's] validity" ( People v. Prunty (2015) 62 Cal.4th 59, 90, 192 Cal.Rptr.3d 309, 355 P.3d 480 ). Despite the various reasons for discounting Witness No. 1's credibility and the minor conflicts between Witnes......
-
People v. Cornejo
...the foregoing assertions of error requires reversal.Following oral argument, our Supreme Court decided People v. Prunty (2015) 62 Cal.4th 59, 192 Cal.Rptr.3d 309, 355 P.3d 480 (Prunty ), which squarely addresses the first contention listed above. We requested supplemental briefing on the ne......
-
Gonzales v. Cal. Victim Comp. Bd.
...the testimony at issue is " " ‘physically impossible or inherently improbable’ " " (People v. Prunty (2015) 62 Cal.4th 59, 89, 192 Cal.Rptr.3d 309, 355 P.3d 480 (conc. & dis. opn. of Cantil-Sakauye, C.J.)). Such deference is accorded to these findings and determinations because the courts l......
-
People v. Guenther
...As with our review of the jury instructions, we consider questions of statutory interpretation de novo. (People v. Prunty (2015) 62 Cal.4th 59, 71, 192 Cal. Rptr.3d 309, 355 P.3d 480.) [10] For our purposes, the same statutory analysis applies to the sodomy and oral copulation statutes, whi......
Get Started for Free
