People v. Rancka, 1

CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division
Writing for the CourtPINE
Citation600 N.Y.S.2d 650,193 A.D.2d 1123
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph D. RANCKA, Appellant. Appeal
Docket NumberNo. 1,1
Decision Date28 May 1993

Richard V. Slater by Donald Nihoul, Mayville, for appellant. John P. Subjack, Mayville, for respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant's contention that the trial court erred in denying his motion for new counsel without making further inquiry regarding the reasons for the request (see, People v. Sides, 75 N.Y.2d 822, 824, 552 N.Y.S.2d 555, 551 N.E.2d 1233; People v. Sawyer, 57 N.Y.2d 12, 18-19, 453 N.Y.S.2d 418, 438 N.E.2d 1133, rearg. dismissed 57 N.Y.2d 776, 454 N.Y.S.2d 1033, 440 N.E.2d 1343, cert. denied 459 U.S. 1178, 103 S.Ct. 830, 74 L.Ed.2d 1024; People v. Slaughter, 162 A.D.2d 640, 641, 556 N.Y.S.2d 955, lv. granted 76 N.Y.2d 944, 563 N.Y.S.2d 73, 564 N.E.2d 683, revd. on other grounds 78 N.Y.2d 485, 577 N.Y.S.2d 206, 583 N.E.2d 919). Furthermore, the record reflects that defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily entered his pleas of guilty (see, People v. Nixon, 21 N.Y.2d 338, 353, 287 N.Y.S.2d 659, 234 N.E.2d 687,cert. denied sub nom. Robinson v. New York, 393 U.S. 1067, 89 S.Ct. 721, 21 L.Ed.2d 709; People v. Latimer, 176 A.D.2d 350, 574 N.Y.S.2d 586). His belated protestations of innocence and claims of coercion do not entitle him to withdraw his pleas (see, People v. Latimer, supra; People v. Tuttle, 141 A.D.2d 584, 530 N.Y.S.2d 158; People v. Melendez, 135 A.D.2d 660, 522 N.Y.S.2d 235, lv. denied 70 N.Y.2d 1008, 526 N.Y.S.2d 943, 521 N.E.2d 1086). Therefore, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's oral motion, made at the time of sentencing, to withdraw his guilty pleas (see, People v. Cannon, 150 A.D.2d 383, 543 N.Y.S.2d 303). (Appeal from Judgment of Chautauqua County Court, Adams, J.--Burglary, 2nd Degree.)

PINE, J.P., and BALIO, LAWTON, FALLON and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • People v. Stephens, 1
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • September 29, 1995
    ...erred in denying his motion for new counsel without making further inquiry regarding the reasons for the motion (see, People v. Rancka, 193 A.D.2d 1123, 1124, 600 N.Y.S.2d 650, lv. denied 82 N.Y.2d 725, 602 N.Y.S.2d 822, 622 N.E.2d 323, People v. Kirkland, 177 A.D.2d 946, 946-947, 577 N.Y.S......
  • People v. Burroughs
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • February 2, 1996
    ...unsupported by the record and is insufficient to entitle defendant to withdraw his plea (see, People v. Cantu, supra; People v. Rancka, 193 A.D.2d 1123, 1124, 600 N.Y.S.2d 650, lv. denied 82 N.Y.2d 725, 602 N.Y.S.2d 822, 622 N.E.2d 323; People Page 268 v. McNair [appeal No. 1], 186 A.D.2d 1......
  • People v. Rancka
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals
    • August 19, 1993
    ...822 602 N.Y.S.2d 822 82 N.Y.2d 725, 622 N.E.2d 323 People v. Rancka (Joseph D.) Court of Appeals of New York Aug 19, 1993 Bellacosa, J. 193 A.D.2d 1123, 600 N.Y.S.2d 650 App.Div. 4, Chautauqua 5/28/93 Denied. ...
  • People v. Williams
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • May 28, 1993
    ...645 598 N.Y.S.2d 645 193 A.D.2d 1123 PEOPLE of the State of New York, Bruce WILLIAMS, Respondent. Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department. May 28, 1993. Page 646 James King by Cindy Intschert, Watertown, for appellant. James McGraw, Syracuse, for respondent. Before PINE, J.P., ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT