People v. Rancka, 1
Court | New York Supreme Court Appellate Division |
Writing for the Court | PINE |
Citation | 600 N.Y.S.2d 650,193 A.D.2d 1123 |
Parties | PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph D. RANCKA, Appellant. Appeal |
Docket Number | No. 1,1 |
Decision Date | 28 May 1993 |
Richard V. Slater by Donald Nihoul, Mayville, for appellant. John P. Subjack, Mayville, for respondent.
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant's contention that the trial court erred in denying his motion for new counsel without making further inquiry regarding the reasons for the request (see, People v. Sides, 75 N.Y.2d 822, 824, 552 N.Y.S.2d 555, 551 N.E.2d 1233; People v. Sawyer, 57 N.Y.2d 12, 18-19, 453 N.Y.S.2d 418, 438 N.E.2d 1133, rearg. dismissed 57 N.Y.2d 776, 454 N.Y.S.2d 1033, 440 N.E.2d 1343, cert. denied 459 U.S. 1178, 103 S.Ct. 830, 74 L.Ed.2d 1024; People v. Slaughter, 162 A.D.2d 640, 641, 556 N.Y.S.2d 955, lv. granted 76 N.Y.2d 944, 563 N.Y.S.2d 73, 564 N.E.2d 683, revd. on other grounds 78 N.Y.2d 485, 577 N.Y.S.2d 206, 583 N.E.2d 919). Furthermore, the record reflects that defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily entered his pleas of guilty (see, People v. Nixon, 21 N.Y.2d 338, 353, 287 N.Y.S.2d 659, 234 N.E.2d 687,cert. denied sub nom. Robinson v. New York, 393 U.S. 1067, 89 S.Ct. 721, 21 L.Ed.2d 709; People v. Latimer, 176 A.D.2d 350, 574 N.Y.S.2d 586). His belated protestations of innocence and claims of coercion do not entitle him to withdraw his pleas (see, People v. Latimer, supra; People v. Tuttle, 141 A.D.2d 584, 530 N.Y.S.2d 158; People v. Melendez, 135 A.D.2d 660, 522 N.Y.S.2d 235, lv. denied 70 N.Y.2d 1008, 526 N.Y.S.2d 943, 521 N.E.2d 1086). Therefore, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's oral motion, made at the time of sentencing, to withdraw his guilty pleas (see, People v. Cannon, 150 A.D.2d 383, 543 N.Y.S.2d 303). (Appeal from Judgment of Chautauqua County Court, Adams, J.--Burglary, 2nd Degree.)
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Stephens, 1
...erred in denying his motion for new counsel without making further inquiry regarding the reasons for the motion (see, People v. Rancka, 193 A.D.2d 1123, 1124, 600 N.Y.S.2d 650, lv. denied 82 N.Y.2d 725, 602 N.Y.S.2d 822, 622 N.E.2d 323, People v. Kirkland, 177 A.D.2d 946, 946-947, 577 N.Y.S......
-
People v. Burroughs
...unsupported by the record and is insufficient to entitle defendant to withdraw his plea (see, People v. Cantu, supra; People v. Rancka, 193 A.D.2d 1123, 1124, 600 N.Y.S.2d 650, lv. denied 82 N.Y.2d 725, 602 N.Y.S.2d 822, 622 N.E.2d 323; People Page 268 v. McNair [appeal No. 1], 186 A.D.2d 1......
-
People v. Rancka
...822 602 N.Y.S.2d 822 82 N.Y.2d 725, 622 N.E.2d 323 People v. Rancka (Joseph D.) Court of Appeals of New York Aug 19, 1993 Bellacosa, J. 193 A.D.2d 1123, 600 N.Y.S.2d 650 App.Div. 4, Chautauqua 5/28/93 Denied. ...
-
People v. Williams
...645 598 N.Y.S.2d 645 193 A.D.2d 1123 PEOPLE of the State of New York, Bruce WILLIAMS, Respondent. Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department. May 28, 1993. Page 646 James King by Cindy Intschert, Watertown, for appellant. James McGraw, Syracuse, for respondent. Before PINE, J.P., ......