People v. Rastall, Docket No. 4728

Decision Date26 November 1969
Docket NumberDocket No. 4728,No. 2,2
Citation174 N.W.2d 33,20 Mich.App. 264
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Eugene RASTALL, Defendant-Appellant
CourtCourt of Appeal of Michigan — District of US

Sanford M. Kesten, Flint, for defendant-appellant.

Frank J. Kelley, Atty. Gen., Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor Gen., Lansing, Robert F. Leonard, Pros. Atty., Donald A. Kuebler, Asst. Pros. Atty., Genesee County, Flint, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before LEVIN, P.J., and T. M. BURNS and DANHOF, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

On June 6, 1967, defendant was convicted of armed robbery after a nonjury trial. C.L.S.1961, § 750.529 (Stat.Ann.1969 Cum.Supp. § 28.797).

The only issue on appeal is whether the trial judge abused his discretion by denying defense counsel's motion for a second continuance made on the day of trial.

The Michigan Supreme Court has repeatedly held that granting or refusing applications for continuances is within the discretion of the trial court, and unless it is shown that his discretion was abused his action will not be reversed, People v. Burby (1922), 218 Mich. 46, 187 N.W. 359. See also People v. Knox (1961), 364 Mich. 620, 111 N.W.2d 828; C.L.1948, § 768.2 (Stat.Ann.1954 Rev. § 28.1025); GCR 1963, 503.

It is clear from the record in this case that there was no abuse of discretion by the trial court.

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • People v. Merritt
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • January 29, 1976
    ...v. Ciatti, 17 Mich.App. 4, 168 N.W.2d 902 (1969), People v. McClendon, 21 Mich.App. 142, 175 N.W.2d 340 (1970), People v. Rastall, 20 Mich.App. 264, 174 N.W.2d 33 (1969), People v. Dermartzex, 29 Mich.App. 213, 185 N.W.2d 33 ...
  • People v. Riley
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • May 21, 1971
    ...A denial of a motion for a continuance is reversible error only if it constitutes an abuse of discretion. People v. Rastall (1969), 20 Mich.App. 264, 174 N.W.2d 33; People v. O'Leary (1967), 6 Mich.App. 115, 148 N.W.2d 516. In this case there was clearly no abuse of Affirmed. LEVIN, Judge (......
  • Hickey v. Kaser
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • November 26, 1969
    ... ... Bradley Lynn KASER and Howard O. Kaser, Defendants-Appellees ... Docket No. 6564 ... Court of Appeals of Michigan, Division No. 2 ... Nov. 26, ... ...
  • People v. Gilleylen, Docket Nos. 8048
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • March 22, 1971
    ...trial. We find no abuse of discretion and do not reverse. People v. Ciatti (1969), 17 Mich.App. 4, 168 N.W.2d 902; People v. Rastall (1969), 20 Mich.App. 264, 174 N.W.2d 33. Reviewing the totality of circumstances leading to conviction, we do not find the court's refusal to delay the trial ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT