People v. Reeb
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
| Writing for the Court | PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, CARNI, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ. |
| Citation | People v. Reeb, 82 A.D.3d 1620, 920 N.Y.S.2d 499, 2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 2181 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011) |
| Decision Date | 25 March 2011 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent,v.Gary REEB, Defendant–Appellant. |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
The Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc., Buffalo (Robert B. Hallborg, Jr., of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant.Frank A. Sedita, III, District Attorney, Buffalo (Michael J. Hillery of Counsel), for Respondent.PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, CARNI, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ.MEMORANDUM:
On October 13, 2004 defendant was convicted upon his plea of guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39[1] ) and was sentenced as a second felony offender to an indeterminate term of incarceration of 6 to 12 years. That crime was committed on September 20, 2003. On January 21, 2010, defendant applied for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46. County Court denied the application on the ground that defendant was ineligible for resentencing because he had a predicate conviction for an “exclusion offense,” i.e., “a crime for which [defendant] was previously convicted within the preceding ten years, excluding any time during which [he] was incarcerated for any reason between the time of commission of the previous felony and the time of commission of the present felony, which was ... a violent felony offense as defined in section 70.02 of the penal law” (CPL 440.46[5][a][i] ). On October 27, 1995, defendant was convicted of two class D violent felony offenses, committed on August 18, 1995 and September 5, 1994, respectively.
The court erred in denying defendant's application on the ground that the two violent felony offenses fall within the definition of “exclusion offense” because they were committed within the 10–year period preceding the instant controlled substance offense for which defendant seeks resentencing. The phrase “within the preceding ten years” in CPL...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
People v. Crosby
...than from the date he committed the present drug felonies ( see People v. Lashley, 83 A.D.3d 868, 920 N.Y.S.2d 421; People v. Reeb, 82 A.D.3d 1620, 920 N.Y.S.2d 499; People v. Williams, 82 A.D.3d 796, 917 N.Y.S.2d 915; People v. Hill, 82 A.D.3d 77, 916 N.Y.S.2d 710; People v. Sosa, 81 A.D.3......
-
People v. Wallace
...but, rather, it refers to the 10–year period preceding the date of filing of the application for resentencing” ( People v. Reeb, 82 A.D.3d 1620, 1621, 920 N.Y.S.2d 499; see People v. Hill, 82 A.D.3d 77, 79–80, 916 N.Y.S.2d 710). We therefore reverse the order and remit the matter to Supreme......
-
People v. Bostic
...which he was applying to be resentenced, rather than from the date of filing of the application for resentencing ( see People v. Reeb, 82 A.D.3d 1620, 920 N.Y.S.2d 499; People v. Hill, 82 A.D.3d 77, 79–80, 916 N.Y.S.2d 710). We therefore reverse the order, and we remit the matter to Supreme......
- People v. Castillo