People v. Reina, 2004-06203.

CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division
Citation2006 NY Slip Op 09282,35 A.D.3d 509,826 N.Y.S.2d 143
Decision Date05 December 2006
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANGEL OMAR REINA, Appellant.
Docket Number2004-06203.
35 A.D.3d 509
826 N.Y.S.2d 143
2006 NY Slip Op 09282
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,
v.
ANGEL OMAR REINA, Appellant.
2004-06203.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.
Decided December 5, 2006.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (DiBella, J.), rendered June 8, 2004, convicting him of rape in the first degree and attempted rape in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's plea of guilty was knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered (see People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9 [1983]). The various grounds for the defendant's claim that the plea was involuntary either are based on matter dehors the record (see People v Hosgor, 24 AD3d 569 [2005]; People v Bruno, 269 AD2d 540 [2000]) or are without merit (see People v Reels, 17 AD3d 488 [2005]; People v Abney, 10 AD3d 617 [2004]).

Appellate review of the defendant's claims concerning his

factual allocution at the plea proceeding and the sentence imposed are precluded by his valid waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248 [2006]; People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273 [1992]; People v Mydosh, 27 AD3d 580 [2006]; People v Curras, 1 AD3d 445, 446 [2003]).

Adams, J.P., Santucci, Mastro and Lifson, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 practice notes
  • People v. Sanders
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • December 11, 2013
    ...909 N.Y.S.2d 662; People v. Ramos, 77 A.D.3d 773, 909 N.Y.S.2d 484; People v. Buniek, 52 A.D.3d 621, 858 N.Y.S.2d 891; People v. Reina, 35 A.D.3d 509, 826 N.Y.S.2d 143; People v. Rosas, 34 A.D.3d 605, 823 N.Y.S.2d 684; People v. Sherrill, 27 A.D.3d 588, 810 N.Y.S.2d 372; People v. Carden, 2......
  • People v. King,
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • March 26, 2014
    ...by his valid waiver of the right to appeal ( see People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 255, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145;People v. Reina, 35 A.D.3d 509, 509–510, 826 N.Y.S.2d 143). Also, by withdrawing all pending and undecided motions, the defendant waived his right to seek appellate review ......
  • People v. Hyland, 2009-06382
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • December 3, 2014
    ...the valid appeal waiver precludes review of that contention (see People v. King, 115 A.D.3d 986, 987, 982 N.Y.S.2d 178 ; People v. Reina, 35 A.D.3d 509, 509–510, 826 N.Y.S.2d 143 ; People v. Mydosh, 27 A.D.3d 580, 580, 810 N.Y.S.2d 370 ; People v. Curras, 1 A.D.3d 445, 446, 766 N.Y.S.2d 892......
  • People v. Hyland,
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • December 3, 2014
    ...the valid appeal waiver precludes review of that contention ( see People v. King, 115 A.D.3d 986, 987, 982 N.Y.S.2d 178; People v. Reina, 35 A.D.3d 509, 509–510, 826 N.Y.S.2d 143; People v. Mydosh, 27 A.D.3d 580, 580, 810 N.Y.S.2d 370; People v. Curras, 1 A.D.3d 445, 446, 766 N.Y.S.2d 892).......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • People v. Sanders
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • December 11, 2013
    ...909 N.Y.S.2d 662; People v. Ramos, 77 A.D.3d 773, 909 N.Y.S.2d 484; People v. Buniek, 52 A.D.3d 621, 858 N.Y.S.2d 891; People v. Reina, 35 A.D.3d 509, 826 N.Y.S.2d 143; People v. Rosas, 34 A.D.3d 605, 823 N.Y.S.2d 684; People v. Sherrill, 27 A.D.3d 588, 810 N.Y.S.2d 372; People v. Carden, 2......
  • People v. King,
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • March 26, 2014
    ...by his valid waiver of the right to appeal ( see People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 255, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145;People v. Reina, 35 A.D.3d 509, 509–510, 826 N.Y.S.2d 143). Also, by withdrawing all pending and undecided motions, the defendant waived his right to seek appellate review ......
  • People v. Hyland, 2009-06382
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • December 3, 2014
    ...the valid appeal waiver precludes review of that contention (see People v. King, 115 A.D.3d 986, 987, 982 N.Y.S.2d 178 ; People v. Reina, 35 A.D.3d 509, 509–510, 826 N.Y.S.2d 143 ; People v. Mydosh, 27 A.D.3d 580, 580, 810 N.Y.S.2d 370 ; People v. Curras, 1 A.D.3d 445, 446, 766 N.Y.S.2d 892......
  • People v. Hyland,
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • December 3, 2014
    ...the valid appeal waiver precludes review of that contention ( see People v. King, 115 A.D.3d 986, 987, 982 N.Y.S.2d 178; People v. Reina, 35 A.D.3d 509, 509–510, 826 N.Y.S.2d 143; People v. Mydosh, 27 A.D.3d 580, 580, 810 N.Y.S.2d 370; People v. Curras, 1 A.D.3d 445, 446, 766 N.Y.S.2d 892).......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT