People v. Richardson
| Court | Illinois Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | DUNN |
| Citation | People v. Richardson, 269 Ill. 275, 109 N.E. 1033 (Ill. 1915) |
| Decision Date | 27 October 1915 |
| Docket Number | No. 10140.,10140. |
| Parties | PEOPLE v. RICHARDSON. |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from Jefferson County Court; A. D. Webb, Judge.
Action by the People against Vol E. Richardson, administrator. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Reversed and remanded, with directions.P. J. Lucey, Atty. Gen. (Chester H. Farthing, of East St. Louis, and Lester H. Strawn, of Springfield, of counsel), for the People.
Joel F. Watson and Conrad Schul, both of Mt. Vernon, for appellee.
Rebecca E. Galbraith died August 14, 1911, intestate, leaving no husband, descendant, ancestor, or next of kin, and leaving real estate and personal property of the value of $23,356.93. The debts and cost of administration amounted to $2,695.50. The property, under the statute, escheats to the county of Jefferson, in which the decedent lived and where the real estate is situated.
[1] The question in this case is whether there is due from the county an inheritance tax on the property. The statute imposes the tax upon the transfer of any property by will or by the intestate laws of this state to persons, institutions, or corporations not specifically exempted. It is insisted that the county does not come within the meaning of the statute, because it is an involuntary public corporation established as a part of the government of the state; that its property is not private property, but public property, and therefore exempt from taxation. The word ‘corporation,’ used in the Inheritance Tax Law imposing the tax, is broad enough to include municipal corporations of every character, and the language purports to apply to every corporation not in the statute afterwards exempted. Section 28 is the only section exempting from the tax, and that applies only when the beneficial interest in any property or its income shall pass by grant, gift, or otherwise to any hospital, religious, educational, bible, missionary, trust, scientific, benevolent, or charitable purpose, or to any trustee, bishop, or minister of any church or religious denomination, to be held and used exclusively for the religious, educational, or charitable uses and purposes of such church, religious denomination, institution, or corporation. The exemption of the property of the county from general taxation is provided by section 2 of chapter 120 of Hurd's Statutes, and it only exempts property used exclusively for the maintenance of the poor, swamp or overflowed lands unsold by the county, public buildings belonging to the county, and the grounds on which such buildings are erected, not exceeding in any case 10 acres. We have held that an inheritance tax is not a tax upon the property, but is a condition which the state imposes upon the right or privilege of succeeding to the ownership of the property, and that that portion of the estate...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Bell v. City of Fayette
... ... This plan and scheme is a ... mere subterfuge and allows cities to become indebted in any ... amount without a vote of the people. It is contrary to the ... laws of Missouri and against public policy. Book v ... Earl, 87 Mo. 251; Barnard & Co. v. Knox County, ... 105 Mo ... ...
-
In re Charles Downer's Estate
... ... construed and limited exemption to a town or city will not be ... enlarged. State, Apt. v. Richardson, Admr., 269 Ill ... 275; In re Arp's Estate (Ind.), 147 N.E. 297; ... Gleason & Otis on Inheritance Taxation (4th ed.), p. 484; ... Barringer v ... ...
-
People v. Deep Rock Oil Corp.
...and the property of such municipalities is not exempt unless made so by clear and specific language of the statute. People v. Richardson, 269 Ill. 275, 109 N. E. 1033;County of McLean v. City of Bloomington, 106 Ill. 209;Cook County v. City of Chicago, 103 Ill. 646. The language of this act......
-
Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Wisconsin v. State
...from the application of the act by virtue of its being an instrumentality of a State, and counsel cite the case of People v. Richardson, 269 Ill. 275, 109 N.E. 1033. In the Richardson case a tax was assessed on an escheat to an Illinois county, and the county resisted on the ground that pub......