People v. Rivers

CourtNew York Court of Appeals
Citation848 N.Y.S.2d 610,9 N.Y.3d 993,878 N.E.2d 1026
PartiesPEOPLE v. RIVERS.
Decision Date01 November 2007
878 N.E.2d 1026
9 N.Y.3d 993
848 N.Y.S.2d 610
PEOPLE
v.
RIVERS.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
November 1, 2007.

Appeal from 3d Dept.: 43 A.D.3d 1247, 842 N.Y.S.2d 611 (Schenectady).


Application for Leave to Criminal Appeal Dismissed. (Pigott, J.).

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • People v. Peterson
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • October 6, 2011
    ...see People v. LaPorte, 53 A.D.3d at 985, 863 N.Y.S.2d 113; People v. Rivers, 43 A.D.3d 1247, 1247, 842 N.Y.S.2d 611 [2007], lv. dismissed 9 N.Y.3d 993, 848 N.Y.S.2d 610, 878 N.E.2d 1026 [2007] ). We find that the court providently exercised its discretion and did not, as defendant contends,......
  • People v. Davis, 105306
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • May 28, 2015
    ...88 A.D.3d at 1027, 930 N.Y.S.2d 497 [citation omitted]; see People v. Rivers, 43 A.D.3d 1247, 1247, 842 N.Y.S.2d 611 [2007], lv. dismissed 9 N.Y.3d 993, 848 N.Y.S.2d 610, 878 N.E.2d 1026 [2007] ). The record reflects 128 A.D.3d 1270that defendant has a lengthy criminal history dating back t......
  • People v. Encarnacion
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • December 28, 2012
    ...justice dictates that the application should be denied’ ” ( People v. Rivers, 43 A.D.3d 1247, 1247, 842 N.Y.S.2d 611,lv. dismissed9 N.Y.3d 993, 848 N.Y.S.2d 610, 878 N.E.2d 1026, quoting L. 2004, ch. 738, § 23), and we conclude that this is such a case. Only five years after his drug convic......
  • People v. Irvin
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • June 8, 2012
    ...cf. People v. Beasley, 47 A.D.3d 639, 640–641, 850 N.Y.S.2d 140;People v. Rivers, 43 A.D.3d 1247, 1247–1248, 842 N.Y.S.2d 611,lv. dismissed9 N.Y.3d 993, 848 N.Y.S.2d 610, 878 N.E.2d 1026). At the very least, the court should have permitted defendant and his attorney to appear and explain “ ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT