People v. Robles

Decision Date31 March 2011
Docket NumberNo. 06CA0934.,06CA0934.
Citation302 P.3d 269
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Steven ROBLES, Defendant–Appellant.
CourtColorado Court of Appeals
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
19 cases
  • People v. Pena-Rodriguez
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • November 8, 2012
    ...74 When the defendant fails to object to a trial court empaneling a numbers jury, appellate review is for plain error. People v. Robles, 302 P.3d 269, 275 (Colo.App.2011) (cert. granted 2011 WL 4017945 (Sept. 12, 2011) ). Plain error requires an error that is both obvious and so undermines ......
  • Mantle v. N. Star Energy & Constr. LLC
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • March 12, 2019
    ... ... NS was to get rid of several overhead items such as: High dollar non-productive people. Excess pickups sent back to Enterprise. Move out of high dollar rental shop in Watford. (Gary has already sold this concurrently as we speak and ... ...
  • People v. Rhea
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • May 8, 2014
    ...when premised on allegations of prosecutorial misconduct—is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. Reed, ¶ 12 ; see People v. Robles, 302 P.3d 269, 279 (Colo.App.2011) (“We review a district court's denial of a motion for a mistrial based on alleged prosecutorial misconduct for an abuse of di......
  • People v. Acosta
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • July 3, 2014 direct questioning by a teacher's aide was admissible as a then-existing physical condition under CRE 803(3) ); People v. Robles, 302 P.3d 269, 277–78 (Colo.App.2011) (victim's statement to a police officer that she was afraid of the defendant and feared that he might kill her was admiss......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Limited Liability Companies and Partnerships in Colorado (CBA) Chapter 7 Owner Liability For Debts of An Entity, Reverse Veil Piercing, and Liability To Return Unlawful Distributions
    • Invalid date
    ...73 (Wyo. 1982); Miles v. CEC Homes, Inc., 753 P.2d 1021 (Wyo. 1988); Sheffield Servs. Co., 211 P.3d 714, overruled in part by Weinstein, 302 P.3d at 269; McCallum Family LLC v. Winger, 221 P.3d 69 (Colo. App. 2009); Polaris Indus. Corp. v. Kaplan, 747 P.2d 884 (Nev. 1987). Sheffield and McC......
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Evidence in Colorado - A Practical Guide (CBA) Chapter 11 Hearsay Exceptions Involving State of Mind
    • Invalid date
    ...may be inadmissible if the statements would refer to irrelevant or prejudicial past alleged misconduct by the defendant. People v. Robles, 302 P.3d 269, 278 (Colo. App. 2011) ("state of mind was relevant to the disputed issue of consent [and statements that] tended to show that [victim] wou......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT