People v. Rowley

• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
• Citation: People v. Rowley, 138 A.D.3d 577, 28 N.Y.S.3d 601(Mem) (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
• Decision Date: 21 April 2016
• Parties: The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Marc ROWLEY, Defendant–Appellant.

138 A.D.3d 577

28 N.Y.S.3d 601 (Mem)

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent,

v.Marc ROWLEY, Defendant–Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

April 21, 2016.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Mark W. Zeno of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Eric Washer of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Edgar G. Walker, J.), rendered August 24, 2011, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of manslaughter in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 25 years, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of vacating the manslaughter conviction and remanding for a new trial on that charge, and otherwise affirmed.

As in People v. Velez, 131 A.D.3d 129, 13 N.Y.S.3d 354 (1st Dept.2015), reversal in the interest of justice is warranted by the court's failure to convey to the jury, either directly or indirectly, in any part of its charge, that an acquittal on the top count of murder in the second degree based on a finding of justification would preclude consideration of the two lesser homicide charges. While the jury may have acquitted on the top charge without relying on defendant's justification defense, it is nevertheless "impossible to discern...