People v. Sanchez

CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
Writing for the CourtBefore MIKOLL
CitationPeople v. Sanchez, 654 N.Y.S.2d 178, 224 A.D.2d 782 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Decision Date08 February 1996
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carmelo SANCHEZ, Appellant.

Cliff Gordon, Monticello, for appellant.

Stephen F. Lungen, District Attorney (Bonnie M. Mitzner, of counsel), Monticello, for respondent.

Before MIKOLL, J.P., and MERCURE, WHITE, CASEY and PETERS, JJ.

MEMORANDUM DECISION.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (Kane, J), rendered September 2, 1994, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

In satisfaction of a five-count indictment charging him with various drug-related crimes, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and was sentenced as a second felony offender to a prison term of 4 1/2 to 9 years. On appeal, he contends that his guilty plea was not knowingly, voluntarily or intelligently made because of his medical condition at the time of the plea. Initially, inasmuch as defendant failed to move to withdraw or vacate his plea, we find that he has waived his right to challenge it on appeal (see, CPL § 440.10; People v. Claudio, 64 N.Y.2d 858, 487 N.Y.S.2d 318, 476 N.E.2d 644; People v. Warren, 47 N.Y.2d 740, 741, 417...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • People v. McElhiney
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 20, 1997
    ...his medical condition prevented him from understanding the significance of his waiver of the right to appeal (see, People v. Sanchez, 224 A.D.2d 782, 654 N.Y.S.2d 178). Indeed, during the plea allocution, defendant specifically denied that his medical condition was affecting him in any way ......
  • People v. Riddick
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 8, 1996
  • State v. Ryan
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 16, 1997
    ...(see, People v. Sloan, 228 A.D.2d 976, 645 N.Y.S.2d 118, lv. denied 88 N.Y.2d 994, 649 N.Y.S.2d 401, 672 N.E.2d 627; People v. Sanchez, 224 A.D.2d 782, 654 N.Y.S.2d 178). Nevertheless, were we to consider this claim, we would find it to be without merit. Our review of the transcript of the ......