People v. Sanders
Decision Date | 23 July 1975 |
Docket Number | No. 54648,54648 |
Citation | 394 Mich. 439,231 N.W.2d 639 |
Parties | PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Paul SANDERS, a/k/a Paul Saunders, Defendant-Appellee. 394 Mich. 439, 231 N.W.2d 639 |
Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
Frank J. Kelley, Atty. Gen., and Robert A. Derengoski, Sol. Gen., Lansing, James M. Justin, Asst. Pros. Atty., Jackson, for the People.
Jerome A. Susskind, Jackson, for defendant.
The defendant was convicted by a jury of second-degree murder. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded for a new trial. People v. Sanders, 43 Mich.App. 698, 204 N.W.2d 706 (1972). We grant leave to appeal and Sua sponte, pursuant to GCR 1963, 865.1(7), reverse the Court of Appeals and affirm the conviction.
There were three opinions in the Court of Appeals, two for reversal and remand for a new trial, one for affirmance. One of the opinions for reversal and remand found error in the cross-examination of the defendant to impeach credibility based on an Arrest which was not shown to have resulted in a conviction. The other opinion for reversal and remand found error in the cross-examination to impeach credibility based on convictions of Misdemeanors.
In People v. Falkner, 389 Mich. 682, 209 N.W.2d 193 (1973), and People v. Rappuhn, 390 Mich. 266, 212 N.W.2d 205 (1973), this Court held that the credibility of a witness may not be impeached by reference to an arrest which does not result in conviction. In People v. Renno, 392 Mich. 45, 219 N.W.2d 422 (1974), this Court held that the credibility of a defendant in a criminal case may not be impeached by reference to 'municipal ordinance or misdemeanor convictions'.
In this case, on Direct examination, defendant acknowledged that he had spent five years in prison (Cf. People v. Rappuhn, supra) for the offense of unarmed robbery committed in 1965 in Jersey City, New Jersey. On cross-examination the following questions were posed and answers elicited:
'
The cross-examination appears to have been in good faith. The defendant's conviction preceded Falkner and Rappuhn. A 'rap sheet' appeared at first glance to show that defendant had been convicted and imprisoned for a robbery committed in Trenton, New Jersey, in 1966.
Reference was also made on cross-examination to defendant's prior misdemeanor convictions of being a disorderly person. However, Renno will not be applied retroactively except in cases where all the following criteria are met: (i) there was no impeachment by reference to a conviction of a felony and (ii) the impeachment by reference to conviction of a misdemeanor occurred first on cross-examination and (iii) the issue was preserved for appeal by proper and timely objection and (iv) the judgment of conviction is pending on appeal or appealable as of right or an application for leave to appeal to this Court has been or can be timely filed. Otherwise, Renno will be applied to those cross-examinations occurring after the decisional date of Renno, supra. People v. Steiner, 392 Mich....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Dietrich
...felony conviction on direct examination and because he did not fully preserve this issue by objecting at trial, People v. Sanders, 394 Mich. 439, 231 N.W.2d 639 (1975). Defendant also assigns as error the trial judge's failure, upon request, to instruct the jury on the lesser included offen......
-
People v. Layher
...120, 124, 282 N.W.2d 252 (1979); People v. Harrington, 76 Mich. App. 118, 121, 256 N.W.2d 52 (1977); see also People v. Sanders, 394 Mich. 439, 440, 231 N.W.2d 639 (1975); People v. Rappuhn, 390 Mich. 266, 270-271, 212 N.W.2d 205 (1973). Consequently, this Court has recognized an exception ......
-
People v. Layher
...Falkner "speaks to the impeachment of any witness by use of an arrest record." Rappuhn at 271, 212 N.W.2d 205. In People v. Sanders, 394 Mich. 439, 440, 231 N.W.2d 639 (1975), this Court characterized Falkner as prohibiting the impeachment of a witness' credibility "by reference to an arres......
-
People v. Harris
...his objection by specific, timely objection. See 22 Michigan Law & Practice, Trial, §§ 71-74, pp. 255-262.4 See also People v. Sanders, 394 Mich. 439, 231 N.W.2d 639 (1975), holding People v. Renno, 392 Mich. 45, 219 N.W.2d 422 (1974), retroactively applicable only when the reference to pri......