People v. Shaffer, 1212

Decision Date13 September 1966
Docket NumberNo. 1212,No. 3,1212,3
Citation4 Mich.App. 192,144 N.W.2d 680
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lyle Charles SHAFFER, Defendant-Appellant. Cal
CourtCourt of Appeal of Michigan — District of US

L. Roland Roegge, Smith & Haughey, Grand Rapids, for appellant.

Frank J. Kelley, Atty. Gen., Robert A. Derengoski, Sol. Gen., Lansing, James K. Miller, Pros. Atty., Kent County, Grand Rapids, for appellee.

Before BURNS, P.J., and FITZGERALD and WATTS, JJ.

BURNS, Judge.

The appellant, who was 18 years of age, married and a member of the armed forces (although absent without leave at the time) entered a plea of guilty to the charge of armed robbery. 1

The appellant claims that a youth of the age of 18 years is not capable of waiving his right to counsel, and that police officers told him if he would plead guilty the judge would be lenient and probably place him on probation.

The trial judge meticulously complied with GCR 1963, 785.3. The record indicates the following colloquy between the court and the appellant:

'The Court: Lyle Shaffer, do you understand the charge placed against you?

'Defendant: Yes, sir.

'The Court: I advise you, this is a serious charge, and if you plead guilty or if you are found guilty after a trial, you will be sent to prison for having committed the offense. You understand that?

'Defendant: Yes, sir.

'The Court: I further advise you that you are entitled to a jury trial to have it determined whether you are guilty or not guilty. Do you understand that?

'Defendant: Yes, sir.

'The Court: I further advise you that you are entitled to be represented by an attorney, that is an attorney you employ. If you have no money to employ an attorney, if you so request, I will appoint an attorney to represent you. Do you understand that?

'Defendant: Yes, sir.

'The Court: Knowing what the charge is, well, first I will ask you this Do you have an attorney?

'Defendant: No, sir.

'The Court: Do you feel that you should have an attorney before we proceed further, or are you prepared to enter a plea at this time?

'Defendant: I plead guilty, Your Honor.

'The Court: I see, you do understand that I will appoint an attorney to represent you if you se request?

'Defendant: Yes, sir.

'The Court: However, knowing what the charge is and knowing your rights, it is your desire to do what?

'Defendant: To plead guilty, sir.

'The Court: Has anyone made you any promises, threats, or abused you in any way to get you to plead guilty?

'Defendant: No, sir.'

The appellant does not claim that the court failed to advise him of his rights, denied him counsel, or failed to inform him of the consequences of a plea of guilty. He merely claims that because he is under 21 years of age (he was 18 at the time of the sentence), he cannot waive his right to counsel. Appellant has not cited any authority for this proposition and this Court does not accept said principle to be the law of Michigan. As stated in Carter v. People of State of Illinois (1946), 329 U.S. 173, 67 S.Ct. 216, 91 L.Ed. 172:

'This does...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • People v. Taylor
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • February 1, 1968
    ... ... Walls (1966), 3 Mich.App. 279, 142 N.W.2d 38; People v. Hoerle (1966), 3 Mich.App. 693, 143 N.W.2d 593; People v. Shaffer (1966), 4 Mich.App. 192, 144 N.W.2d 680; People v. Steele (1966), 4 Mich.App. 352, 144 N.W.2d 834; People v. Winegar (1966), 4 Mich.App. 547, 145 ... ...
  • People v. Simpson
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • June 30, 1971
    ... ... People v. Stanton (1970) 28 Mich.App. 597, 184 N.W.2d 576; People v. Schwartz (1967) 6 Mich.App. 581, 149 N.W.2d 897; People v. Shaffer (1966), 4 Mich.App. 192, 144 N.W.2d 680; People v. Wilson (1966), 5 Mich.App. 428, 146 N.W.2d 826 ...         The prosecution argues that ... ...
  • People v. Inosencio, Docket No. 9828
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • July 26, 1971
    ... ... People v. Shaffer, 4 Mich.App. 192, 144 N.W.2d 680; People v. Washington (1970), 23 Mich.App. 638, 179 N.W.2d 259 ...         A perusal of the record below ... ...
  • People v. Menton, Docket No. 2929
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • June 27, 1967
    ... ...         Defendant Menton was advised that as a consequence of his guilty plea He could be sent to prison. In People v. Shaffer (1966), 4 Mich.App. 192, 144 N.W.2d 680, this Court found compliance on the part of the trial judge with GCR 1963, 785.3. There the trial judge ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT