People v. Shaw

Decision Date09 July 1964
Citation252 N.Y.S.2d 301,21 A.D.2d 908
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Harvey SHAW, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

William W. Kleinman, Brooklyn, for appellant.

Aaron Nussbaum, Brooklyn, of counsel, for respondent.

Appeal by defendant Shaw from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March 14, 1963 after a jury trial, convicting him of conspiracy, as a felony (Penal Law, § 508-a) and of carrying a dangerous weapon, as a misdemeanor (Penal Law, § 1897), and imposing sentence.This defendant was indicted and tried jointly with one Thomas Montgomery.Judgment affirmed.38 Misc.2d 401, 238 N.Y.S.2d 104.(SeePeople v. Montgomery, App.Div., 252 N.Y.S.2d 194, decided herewith).

BELDOCK, P. J., and KLEINFELD, CHRIST, BRENNAN and HILL, JJ., concur.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
2 cases
  • People v. Montgomery
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 9, 1964
    ...imposing sentence. This defendant was indicted and tried jointly with one Harvey Shaw, whose appeal has been decided herewith (21 A.D.2d 908, 252 N.Y.S.2d 301.) Judgment On this record, we find: (1) that both the defendants Montgomery and Shaw were lawfully arrested at Fulton Street and Bed......
  • People v. Montgomery
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • January 14, 1965
    ...New York. Jan. 14, 1965. Appeals from Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, 21 A.D.2d 904, 252 N.Y.S.2d 194, and 21 A.D.2d 908, 252 N.Y.S.2d 301. Both defendants were convicted of conspiracy as a felony, and defendant Montgomery was convicted of carrying a dangerous weapon a......