People v. Smith

Docket Number119659
Decision Date30 December 2016

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
32 cases
  • People v. Clark
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • June 6, 2019
    ...issue involves statutory interpretation, which presents a question of law and is subject to de novo review. People v. Smith , 2016 IL 119659, ¶ 15, 412 Ill.Dec. 793, 76 N.E.3d 1251. For the following reasons, we hold that the statute does not require the State to make such a showing. ¶ 18 T......
  • Doe v. LYFT, Inc.
    • United States
    • Appellate Court of Illinois
    • September 30, 2020
    ...imports, nor may we rewrite a statute to add provisions or limitations the legislature did not include." People v. Smith , 2016 IL 119659, ¶ 28, 412 Ill.Dec. 793, 76 N.E.3d 1251. ¶ 28 Were we to hold that TNCs are subject to the same liability standards as common carriers, it would strip th......
  • People v. Reese
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • October 19, 2017
    ...the plain error doctrine, it is appropriate to first determine whether a clear or obvious error occurred. People v. Smith , 2016 IL 119659, ¶ 39, 412 Ill.Dec. 793, 76 N.E.3d 1251. ¶ 61 Illinois Supreme Court Rule 401(a) governs the trial court's acceptance of a defendant's waiver of counsel......
  • People v. Wallace
    • United States
    • Appellate Court of Illinois
    • September 29, 2023
    ...imports, nor may we rewrite a statute to add provisions or limitations the legislature did not include. People v. Smith, 2016 IL 119659, ¶ 28, 412 Ill.Dec. 793, 76 N.E.3d 1251. In view of the plain language of the armed habitual criminal statute and the fact that it references past convicti......
  • Get Started for Free