People v. Smith

Decision Date23 March 1897
Citation112 Mich. 192,70 N.W. 466
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
PartiesPEOPLE v. SMITH ET AL.

Error to recorder's court of Detroit; Joseph W. Donovan, Judge.

John Smith and William French were convicted of forgery, and appeal. Reversed.

Fred A Maynard, Atty. Gen., and Allan H. Frazer, Pros. Atty., for the People.

Fred R Gartner and Edward A. Stricker, for defendants.

HOOKER J.

The defendants were convicted, of the offense of forgery, upon an information stating the offense as follows, viz.:

"Feloniously did utter and publish as true a certain false, forged, and counterfeited letter of attorney, which said false, forged and counterfeited letter of attorney is as follows:
"'Union Iron & Steel Workers: This is to certify that the bearers are members in good standing, and are authorized to solicit subscriptions for our relief fund. All donations thankfully received.
"'Committee: Chas. W. Harper, H. C. Guthrie, William Sloan.
"'Secretary: Jas. W. O'Brien.

Pingree and Smith, Pd. $5.00

George W. Wilson, $3.00

Meyer Binswangaub, Pd. $3.00

Mabley and Company, Pd. $5.00'

-With intent then and there to injure and defraud, they, the said John Smith and William French, at the time they so uttered and published the said false, forged, and counterfeited letter of attorney as aforesaid, then and there well knowing the same to be false, forged, and counterfeited."

The theory of the prosecution appears to have been that there was no such organization as the "Union Iron & Steel Workers," and we think there was testimony from which the jury might properly so find. The principal questions in the case are: (1) Whether this instrument was within the list mentioned in the statute. (2) If so, whether the fact that it was called a "letter of attorney" in the information was fatal, if it was not legally a letter of attorney. (3) Whether it was of any apparent legal effect and so capable of being forged. This instrument, upon its face, purports to give authority to the defendants to solicit and receive donations for a fund ostensibly under the control and charge of an organization. If this can properly be called a "letter of attorney," or an "order for money," it is within the statute. If not, the offense which the prosecutor sought to prove was more in the nature of obtaining money by false tokens and pretenses. We think it cannot be called a "letter of attorney" or an "order for money." A...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Chapin v. Letcher
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • December 2, 1958
    ... ... However, even if it should be found invalid it operates as color of title for the heirs of the real property of Margareth W. Hasby. In Smith v. Nyreen, N.D., 81 N.W.2d 769, this court held that the final decree of distribution by the county court which professed to pass title to the ... Hasby, People v. Smith, 112 Mich. 192, 17 N.W. 466, 57 Am.St.Rep. 392; Mullins v. Commonwealth, 179 Ky. 71, 200 N.W. 9, 11. It gave no power or authority over the ... ...
  • Leslie v. State
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • May 28, 1902
    ... ... W., 750; Metz v ... State, 46 Neb. 547; State v. Cameron, 40 Vt ... 556; Linbeck v. State (Wash.), 25 P. 452; ... Farrell v. People, 133 Ill. 244; State v ... Landry, 85 Me. 95; Matthews v. People, 6 Colo ... App., 456; People v. Flynn, 73 Cal. 513; ... Foxwell v. State, 63 ... was not a "letter of attorney" or "order for ... money," under the Michigan statutes. (People v ... Smith, 112 Mich. 192.) The difference between an ... authority to solicit subscriptions and an authority to ... collect and receive payment of money due ... ...
  • Leslie v. State
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • July 26, 1901
    ... ... to show fraudulent tendency. (R. S., 5128, 5135; State v ... Wheeler, 19 Minn. 98; People v. Smith, 112 ... Mich. 192; 8 Ency. Law (1st Ed.), 494, 497, 523, and cases ... cited; 9 Ency. Pl. & Pr., 550, 559-567, and cases cited; ... Reed ... ...
  • Hess v. Preferred Masonic Mut. Acc. Ass'n of America
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • March 23, 1897
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • CHAPTER 14 SURFING THE TITLE WAVE -- TRICKY TITLE ISSUES FOR NEW TITLE ATTORNEYS
    • United States
    • FNREL - Special Institute Mineral Title Examination (FNREL) 2012 Ed.
    • Invalid date
    ...Matter of Trust of Franzen, 955 P.2d 1018 (Colo. 1998); Wysong v. Automobile Underwriters, 184 N.E. 783 (Ind. 1933); People v. Smith, 70 N.W. 466 (Mich. 1897); Trenouth v. Mulroney, 227 P.2d 590 (Mont. 1951); North Bend Senior Citizens Home, Inc. v. Cook, 623 N.W.2d 681 (Neb. 2001); Eastham......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT