People v. Solomon
| Decision Date | 28 January 1974 |
| Docket Number | No. 55153,55153 |
| Citation | People v. Solomon, 214 N.W.2d 60, 391 Mich. 767 (Mich. 1974) |
| Parties | PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Willie SOLOMON, Defendant-Appellant. 391 Mich. 767, 214 N.W.2d 60 |
| Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
Before the Entire Bench.
ORDER
On order of the Court, the delayed application by defendant and appellant for leave to appeal is considered and the same is hereby granted.The matter is remanded to the Recorder's Court for the City of Detroit for proceedings consistent with the dissenting opinion of Judge Lesinski reported at 47 Mich.App. 208, 216, 209 N.W. 257(1973).This Court retains no further jurisdiction over the matter.
M.S. COLEMAN, J., would deny leave.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
28 cases
-
People v. McElhaney
... ... During the day of the attack, the complainant had more than an ample opportunity to observe her attacker. Defendant's preliminary examination took place only two months after the attack. Having reviewed the totality of the circumstances, People v. Solomon, 47 Mich.App. 208, 216, 218-219, 209 N.W.2d 257 (1973) (dissent of Lesinski, C.J.), adopted 391 Mich. 767, 214 N.W.2d 60 (1974); People v. Johnson, 58 Mich.App. 347, 353, 227 N.W.2d 337 (1975), we find that defendant's right to due process was not violated by the complainant's identification of ... ...
-
People v. Petrella
...this case, we do not believe that the identifications were impermissibly suggestive. Defendant also argues, based on People v. Solomon, 391 Mich. 767, 214 N.W.2d 60 (1974), that the identification at the preliminary examination confrontation was unnecessarily suggestive as well. However, in......
-
People v. Sykes
...does not affect the admissibility of the testimony itself.9 People v. Kachar, 400 Mich. 78, 252 N.W.2d 807 (1977); People v. Solomon, 391 Mich. 767, 214 N.W.2d 60 (1974); People v. Anderson, 389 Mich. 155, 205 N.W.2d 461 (1973); People v. Johnson, 202 Mich.App. 281, 508 N.W.2d 509 (1993); P......
-
People v. Martin
... ... "Since the credibility of the out-of-court declarant could be tested at trial, the likelihood of prejudice was minimal." People v. Coppernol, at 752, 229 N.W.2d at 917, citing People v. Solomon, 47 Mich.App. 208, 212-214, 209 N.W.2d 257 (1973), rev'd on other grounds, 391 Mich. 767, 214 N.W.2d 60 (1974), McCormick, Evidence (2d ed.), § 246, p. 584 ... In the instant case, as in Coppernol, all parties to the unobjected-to double hearsay were present at the trial and did ... ...
Get Started for Free