People v. St. Louis, 2018–09332
| Court | New York Supreme Court Appellate Division |
| Citation | 127 N.Y.S.3d 774 (Mem),186 A.D.3d 875 |
| Docket Number | Ind.No. 396/16,2018–09332 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Hervil ST. LOUIS, appellant. |
| Decision Date | 26 August 2020 |
186 A.D.3d 875
127 N.Y.S.3d 774 (Mem)
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent,
v.
Hervil ST. LOUIS, appellant.
2018–09332
Ind.No. 396/16
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Submitted—June 3, 2020
August 26, 2020
Joseph A. Hanshe, Sayville, NY, for appellant.
Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Glenn Green of counsel), for respondent.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, ROBERT J. MILLER, COLLEEN D. DUFFY, HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (William J. Condon, J.), rendered May 3, 2018, convicting him of attempted operating as a major trafficker, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.
ORDERED that the motion of Joseph A. Hanshe for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted, and he is directed to turn over all papers in his possession to the appellant's new counsel assigned herein; and it is further,
ORDERED that Steven A. Feldman, 1129 Northern Blvd., # 404, Manhasset, NY, 11030, is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal; and it is further,
ORDERED that the respondent is directed to furnish a copy of the certified transcript of the proceedings to the appellant's new assigned counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that new counsel shall serve and file a brief on behalf of the appellant within 90 days of the date of this decision and order on motion, and the respondent shall serve and file its brief within 30 days after the brief on behalf of the appellant is served and filed. By prior decision and order on motion of this Court dated October 19, 2018, the appellant was granted leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, with the appeal to be heard on the original...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Campbell, 2019–10461, 2019–10463
...issues with reference to the facts of the case (see People v. Patterson, 188 A.D.3d 723, 131 N.Y.S.3d 907 ; People v. St. Louis, 186 A.D.3d 875, 876, 127 N.Y.S.3d 774 ). The brief does not review either the plea colloquy or the colloquy regarding the appellant's waiver of the right to appea......
-
People v. Adams, 2018–09333
...the underlying facts and states a bare conclusion that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal (see People v. Louis, 186 A.D.3d 875, 127 N.Y.S.3d 774 ; 139 N.Y.S.3d 866 People v. Sofo, 186 A.D.3d at 875, 127 N.Y.S.3d 804 ; People v. Nikac, 175 A.D.3d 1323, 109 N.Y.S.3d 308 )......
-
People v. Sofo, 2018–08672
...to the relevant evidence, with specific references to the record; identify and assess the efficacy of any significant objections, 186 A.D.3d 875 applications, or motions; and identify possible issues for appeal, with reference to the facts of the case and relevant legal authority" ( Matter ......
-
People v. Campbell, 2019-10461
...analyze potential appellate issues with reference to the facts of the case (see People v Patterson, 188 A.D.3d 723; People v St. Louis, 186 A.D.3d 875, 876). The brief does not review either the plea colloquy or the colloquy regarding the appellant's waiver of the right to appeal in any det......
-
People v. Campbell, 2019–10461, 2019–10463
...issues with reference to the facts of the case (see People v. Patterson, 188 A.D.3d 723, 131 N.Y.S.3d 907 ; People v. St. Louis, 186 A.D.3d 875, 876, 127 N.Y.S.3d 774 ). The brief does not review either the plea colloquy or the colloquy regarding the appellant's waiver of the right to appea......
-
People v. Adams, 2018–09333
...the underlying facts and states a bare conclusion that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal (see People v. Louis, 186 A.D.3d 875, 127 N.Y.S.3d 774 ; 139 N.Y.S.3d 866 People v. Sofo, 186 A.D.3d at 875, 127 N.Y.S.3d 804 ; People v. Nikac, 175 A.D.3d 1323, 109 N.Y.S.3d 308 )......
-
People v. Sofo, 2018–08672
...to the relevant evidence, with specific references to the record; identify and assess the efficacy of any significant objections, 186 A.D.3d 875 applications, or motions; and identify possible issues for appeal, with reference to the facts of the case and relevant legal authority" ( Matter ......
-
People v. Campbell, 2019-10461
...analyze potential appellate issues with reference to the facts of the case (see People v Patterson, 188 A.D.3d 723; People v St. Louis, 186 A.D.3d 875, 876). The brief does not review either the plea colloquy or the colloquy regarding the appellant's waiver of the right to appeal in any det......