People v. St. Louis

• Decision Date: 26 August 2020
• Docket Number: Ind.No. 396/16,2018–09332
• Parties: The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Hervil ST. LOUIS, appellant.
• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

186 A.D.3d 875

127 N.Y.S.3d 774 (Mem)

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent,

v.Hervil ST. LOUIS, appellant.

2018–09332

Ind.No. 396/16

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Submitted—June 3, 2020

August 26, 2020

Joseph A. Hanshe, Sayville, NY, for appellant.

Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Glenn Green of counsel), for respondent.

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, ROBERT J. MILLER, COLLEEN D. DUFFY, HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (William J. Condon, J.), rendered May 3, 2018, convicting him of attempted operating as a major trafficker, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the motion of Joseph A. Hanshe for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted, and he is directed to turn over all papers in his possession to the appellant's new counsel assigned herein; and it is further,

ORDERED that Steven A. Feldman, 1129 Northern Blvd., # 404, Manhasset, NY, 11030, is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal; and it is further,

ORDERED that the respondent is directed to furnish a copy of the certified transcript of the proceedings to the appellant's new assigned counsel; and it is further, ORDERED that new counsel shall serve and file a brief on behalf of the appellant within 90 days of the date of this decision and order on motion, and the respondent shall serve and file its brief within 30 days after the brief on behalf of the appellant is served and filed. By prior decision and order on motion of this Court dated October 19, 2018, the appellant was granted leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, with the appeal to be heard on the original papers, including a certified transcript of the proceedings, and on the briefs of the parties. The parties are directed to file one original and five duplicate hard copies, and one digital copy, of their respective briefs, and to serve one hard copy on each other (see 22 NYCRR 1250.9 [a][4]; [c][1] ).

An attorney's motion to be relieved pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 should be accompanied by a brief " ‘reciting the underlying facts and highlighting anything in the record that might arguably support the appeal’ " ( Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 A.D.3d 252, 255, 931 N.Y.S.2d 676, quoting People v. Saunders, 52 A.D.2d 833, 833, 384 N.Y.S.2d 161 ). As this Court has explained, "counsel must, at a minimum, draw the Court's attention to the relevant evidence, with specific references to the record; identify and assess the efficacy of any significant objections, applications, or motions; and identify possible issues for appeal, with reference to the facts of the case and relevant legal authority" ( Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 A.D.3d at 258, 931 N.Y.S.2d 676 ). "Counsel cannot merely recite the underlying facts, and state a bare conclusion that, after reviewing the record ..., it is the writer's opinion that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal" ( id. ).

Here, the brief submitted by the appellant's counsel pursuant to ...