People v. Stillman
| Decision Date | 19 September 1945 |
| Docket Number | No. 28588.,28588. |
| Citation | 391 Ill. 227,62 N.E.2d 698 |
| Parties | PEOPLE v. STILLMAN. |
| Court | Illinois Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Error to Circuit Court, Peoria County; Joseph E. Daily, Judge.
Max Stillman was convicted or robbery, and he brings error.
Judgment affirmed.
Max Stillman, pro se.
George F. Barrett, Atty. Gen., and Roy P. Hull, State's Atty., of Peoria (C. E. McNemar, of Peoria, of counsel), for the People.
This case is here on a writ of error to the circuit court of Peoria county. Plaintiff in error was found guilty by a jury of the crime of robbery. He was sentenced to the penitentiary in accordance with the statute. The sole error relied upon in this court is the action of the trial court in overruling the motion of plaintiff in error for discharge for want of prosecution under section 18 of division XIII of the Criminal Code. Ill.Rev.Stat.1943, chap. 38, par. 748.
The record shows that the indictment was returned on March 17, 1938. On March 22, 1940, plaintiff in error was arrested and committed to the county jail to await trial. On May 20, 1940, the cause was continued, on motion of plaintiff in error, to the September term, 1940, of the circuit court of Peoria county. At the September term, 1940, the cause was continued, on motion of the State's Attorney, to December 31, 1940. A trial was entered upon on December 31, 1940, which resulted in a verdict finding the defendant guilty. The verdict was returned on January 3, 1941.
On December 23, 1940, plaintiff in error filed a motion for his discharge under said section of the Criminal Code, alleging that he was, on March 22, 1940, committed to jail, and had not been tried within four months after the date of his commitment. The motion was heard and denied by the trial court. This statute was enacted to give effect to section 9 of the Bill of Rights, Smith-Hurd Stats., securing to the accused in a criminal case a speedy public trial, but which does not fix specific limitations. People v. Meisenhelter, 381 Ill. 378, 45 N.E.2d 678;People v. Maniatis, 297 Ill. 72, 130 N.E. 323. The right to a speedy trial guaranteed to a defendant by the constitution is only against arbitrary and oppressive delays. Weyrich v. People, 89 Ill. 90. We have repeatedly held that where the failure to try a defendant within the time prescribed by the statute is occasioned by the defendant himself, the statute does not apply. People v. Hotz, 261 Ill. 239, 103 N.E. 1007;Healy v. People, 177 Ill. 306, 52 N.E. 426;People ex rel. Woodruff v. Matson, 129 Ill. 591, 22 N.E. 456;Dougherty v. People, 124 Ill. 557, 16 N.E. 852.
When plaintiff in error was committed on March 22, 1940, he was, under the above statute, entitled to a trial within four months from the date of his commitment. However, on May 20, 1940, he sought and obtained a continuance to the September term. This constituted a waiver of his right to be tried within four months from the date of his original commitment. By this action he placed it beyond the power of the People to give him a trial until the September term, 1940. He was not, therefore, entitled to a trial until the convening of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Hairston
...412, 211 N.E.2d 687; People v. Rankins, 18 Ill.2d 260, 163 N.E.2d 814; People v. Hartman, 408 Ill. 133, 96 N.E.2d 449; People v. Stillman, 391 Ill. 227, 62 N.E.2d 698; Dougherty v. People, 124 Ill. 557, 16 N.E. 852.) It is axiomatic that where a statute has been judicially construed and the......
-
People v. Morris
...period within which he would otherwise be required to be tried, People v. Hartman, 408 Ill. 133, 96 N.E.2d 449; People v. Stillman, 391 Ill. 227, 62 N.E.2d 698; People v. Meisenhelter, 381 Ill. 378; People v. Maniatis, 297 Ill. 72, 130 N.E. 323, and where the failure to try the defendant wi......
-
United States v. Ragen
...for want of prosecution within a specified period is mandatory. People v. Stillwagon, 373 Ill. 211, 25 N.E.2d 795; People v. Stillman, 391 Ill. 227, 62 N.E.2d 698. If this is the law, it is clear from the language of the applicable statute and the cases cited that exceptions exist. One is t......
-
People v. Richardson
...to run on November 26 and the trial on January 2, 1957, was timely. People v. Niemoth, 409 Ill. 111, 98 N.E.2d 733; People v. Stillman, 391 Ill. 227, 62 N.E.2d 698. The defendant complains of the admission of certain evidence. His daughter was permitted to testify without objection to an ac......