People v. Stockard, 55240

Decision Date18 April 1974
Docket NumberNo. 55240,55240
Citation219 N.W.2d 68,391 Mich. 481
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Phillip STOCKARD, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtMichigan Supreme Court

John B. Phelps, Detroit, for defendant-appellant.

Donald A. Kuebler, Flint, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before THOMAS M. KAVANAGH, C. J., and KAVANAGH, SWAINSON, WILLIAMS, LEVIN, COLEMAN and FITZGERALD, JJ.

Before the Entire Bench.

ORDER

On order of the Court the application by defendant and appellant for leave to appeal is considered and the same is hereby granted. The Court on its own motion, pursuant to GCR 1963, 853.2(4) summarily affirms the defendant's conviction. The Court of Appeals is clearly in error, however, in holding that defendant per se is precluded from assigning as error on appeal a failure to grant a motion for change of venue because defendant failed to exhaust all peremptory challenges.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • People v. Partee
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • January 20, 1984
    ...We agree with defendant that the failure to exhaust peremptory challenges does not waive an objection to venue. People v. Stockard, 391 Mich. 481, 219 N.W.2d 68 (1974). However, the fact that that defendant exercised only 15 of his 20 challenges suggests that the defendant was able to impan......
  • People v. Stergowski
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • June 25, 1974
  • People v. Haggart
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • July 12, 1985
    ...error on appeal, it is a factor to be considered in showing that the jury was satisfactory when finally impaneled. People v. Stockard, 391 Mich. 481, 219 N.W.2d 68 (1974). Finally, all of the jurors stated, without reservation, that they could lay aside their impressions or opinions about t......
  • People v. Harrell
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • December 21, 1976
    ...failure to exercise all Harrell's peremptory challenges does not waive his right to raise this issue on appeal. Cf. People v. Stockard, 391 Mich. 481, 219 N.W.2d 68 (1974). To say to a litigant who unsuccessfully sought more extensive Voir dire than was allowed that his failure to exercise ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT