People v. Tolentino

Decision Date10 May 2011
Docket NumberNo. 1–09–1388.,1–09–1388.
Citation409 Ill.App.3d 598,949 N.E.2d 1167,351 Ill.Dec. 72
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff–Appellee,v.Edwin TOLENTINO, Defendant–Appellant.
CourtUnited States Appellate Court of Illinois

409 Ill.App.3d 598
949 N.E.2d 1167
351 Ill.Dec.
72

The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff–Appellee,
v.
Edwin TOLENTINO, Defendant–Appellant.

No. 1–09–1388.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Second Division.

May 10, 2011.


[949 N.E.2d 1169]

Michael J. Pelletier, State Appellate Defender, Office of the State Appellate Defender, Chicago, IL (Patricia Unsinn, Erin E.G. McFeron, of counsel) for Appellant.Anita Alvarez, State's Attorney, County of Cook, Chicago, IL (Alan J. Spellberg, Susan R. Schierl Sullivan, Kathryn A. Schierl, of counsel), for Appellee.

[409 Ill.App.3d 599] OPINION
Justice HARRIS delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion.

[351 Ill.Dec. 74] Defendant, Edwin Tolentino, was convicted after a bench trial of attempted first degree murder of a peace officer, being an armed habitual criminal, and aggravated discharge of a firearm in the shootings of Officer George Junkovic and Patrick Cady. The trial court sentenced Tolentino to 28 years' imprisonment for the attempted first degree murder and a 20–year sentence enhancement for personally discharging a firearm (a total of 48 years), plus two concurrent 20–year terms for the armed habitual criminal and aggravated discharge of a firearm convictions. On appeal, he contends: (1) the trial court improperly applied the 20–year sentence enhancement contrary to the plain language of section 8–4(c) of the Criminal Code OF 1961 (720 ILCS 5/8–4(c) (West 2006)); (2) his conviction of the offense of being an armed habitual criminal violates the ex post facto clause of the United States Constitution (U.S. Const. Art. I, § 9, cl. 3; § 10, cl. 1); (3) his conviction for aggravated discharge of a firearm violates the one-act, one-crime rule; and (4) his mittimus should be corrected to reflect 1,083 days' credit for presentence incarceration 1. For the reasons hereinafter set forth we affirm Tolentino's convictions and 20–year concurrent sentences for armed habitual criminal and aggravated discharge

[351 Ill.Dec. 75 , 949 N.E.2d 1170]

of a firearm. We affirm Tolentino's conviction and sentence and remand the case for issuance of a corrected mittimus reflecting 1,083 days of credit.

[409 Ill.App.3d 600] JURISDICTION

The trial court sentenced Tolentino on December 10, 2008, and he filed a timely notice of appeal on December 10, 2008. Accordingly, this court has jurisdiction pursuant to article VI, section 6, of the Illinois Constitution and Illinois Supreme Court Rules 603 and 606, governing appeals from a final judgment of conviction in a criminal case entered below. Ill. Const.1970, art. VI, § 6; Ill. S.Ct. R. 603 (eff.Oct.1, 2010); R. 606 (eff.Mar.20, 2009).

BACKGROUND

At Tolentino's bench trial, Patrick Cady testified for the State. On December 16, 2005, at approximately 11:30 p.m., Cady was at a liquor store at North Avenue and Kedzie in Chicago, Illinois. He was with other Latin King members Gabriel Williams, Edwardo Rodriguez, Samuel Gonzalez, and Andre Ramos. While Cady was inside the store, Williams and Ramos threw bottles at the window of a white Oldsmobile Cutlass. Cady was told that Edwin Tolentino, also known as Chiquito, was in the car. The Oldsmobile drove off and the group began walking down North Avenue toward Wabansia when Ramos received a phone call. Ramos put the call on speaker phone. The caller asked the group's location and Ramos told the caller their location. Soon thereafter, someone wearing a ski mask and black jacket came toward the group and started shooting at them. Cady and his companions ran to a friend's apartment at 3221 West North Avenue, and a man in a ski mask also entered the building. The masked man, however, wore a different shirt than the shooter. The man called out “come down here bitch.” When Cady heard the person's voice, he believed it was the same person he had heard on the speaker phone. The man fired a shot into the hallway toward the stairwell and left after Cady and the others went inside the apartment.

From the apartment window, Cady saw the man exit the building and walk across North Avenue to Sawyer Street before turning into an alley. A Lincoln with a dark rag top exited the alley, and due to the proximity in time, Cady believed the shooter was in the Lincoln. Police were called to 3221 West North Avenue and Cady spoke to the officers. The officers then left after receiving a call. Cady and his friends also left the apartment and got into a friend's car to follow the police. At Division and Campbell, they saw several police cars and the unoccupied Lincoln with the doors open. Cady later saw Tolentino, without a mask, getting into a paddy wagon.

Officers Alftedo Roman and Joseph Annerino were working with another officer on December 16, 2005. That night, around 11:40 p.m., they were traveling in an unmarked car when they heard a message of [409 Ill.App.3d 601] a person shot in the area of North and Kedzie. A second message indicated the shooter may be “Chiquito”, whom Officer Roman knew from previous encounters. Officer Roman drove to Haddon and Washtenaw, an area frequented by Tolentino and the Spanish Cobras. Officer Roman believed Tolentino was a member of the Spanish Cobras. The officers then spotted a blue Lincoln going west on Haddon, and they pulled behind the car. Although they activated the lights and siren of their unmarked car, the Lincoln did not stop. The Lincoln eventually stopped in a vacant lot at 2509 West Division. Tolentino got out of the car and started running. The officers chased Tolentino, shouting “Stop, police.” As he neared the end of

[351 Ill.Dec. 76 , 949 N.E.2d 1171]

the lot, Tolentino threw a weapon to the ground which Officer Annerino retrieved. The weapon was a .25–caliber semiautomatic pistol containing one live round. Officer Annerino then resumed the chase.

Other units soon responded and Officer Junkovic, along with his partners Officers Hurlahy and Morales, joined the chase. When Officers Roman and Junkovic were 6 to 10 feet from Tolentino, they heard him yell, “I have a gun. I'll shoot you” a number of times. Officer Junkovic testified that Tolentino looked right at him when he shouted the statements. Officer Annerino stated that he also heard Tolentino's threats. As a precaution, Officer Junkovic ran on the street parallel to Tolentino so that there were parked cars between them. Officer Junkovic saw Tolentino reach into his waist and pull out a weapon. Tolentino raised the weapon and fired a shot in Officer Junkovic's direction. Officer Roman heard a gunshot and saw a flash. When Tolentino aimed his weapon at Officer Roman, the officer pulled out his .45–caliber service weapon and fired two shots in Tolentino's direction.

Tolentino continued running until he came to a gangway at 2506 West Haddon with a five-foot to six-foot tall gate. Officer Roman ordered Tolentino to get down, and when Tolentino raised his weapon towards him, Officer Roman fired four more shots. Tolentino then scaled the fence and fell onto the pavement on the other side. He crawled through the yard and Officer Roman lost sight of him. At this point, other officers had responded. Officer Rojas was on the other side of the fence and found Tolentino leaning against a tree or pole. Officer Rojas ordered Tolentino to stop, but Tolentino kept moving until he was out of the officer's sight. Officer Rojas and his partner got permission to go through the building to the backyard, where they found Tolentino under the porch. They ordered Tolentino to come out and when he eventually did, the officers performed an emergency take-down in which Tolentino was taken to the ground and handcuffed. The gun Tolentino used to fire at Officers Junkovic and Roman was not recovered.

[409 Ill.App.3d 602] Officer Mark Harvey recovered a cell phone and a bullet fragment near the front yard of 2502 West Haddon. A .45–automatic caliber cartridge case was retrieved at 1140 North Campbell, and a .45–caliber shell casing was recovered in the gangway near the front of 2506 West Haddon. Officer Paul Presnell recovered a fired cartridge case and a fired bullet at 3221 West North Avenue. He also observed a hole in the drywall of the stairwell. The parties stipulated that if called to testify, firearms examiner Jennifer Sher would state that she received a .25–caliber Beretta and one unfired bullet. She analyzed this evidence, along with the .25–caliber fired cartridge case recovered from 3221 West North Avenue. In her opinion, the cartridge case and fired bullet came from the .25–caliber weapon. A gunshot residue test (GSR) was performed on Tolentino. Based on the results of that test, Robert Berk, an expert in GSR examination, concluded that Tolentino was either in an environment where a weapon was fired, came into contact with something that had GSR on it, or had fired a weapon.

Detective Robert Cordaro met with Tolentino after his arrest. Tolentino was wearing a brown, hooded sweatshirt, black jacket with blue liner, blue jeans, and one brown boot. Detective Cordaro recovered a ski mask from the jacket pocket. He also photographed a tattoo of “Chiquito” on Tolentino's right leg. A medical technician later took a buccal swab from Tolentino which was sealed and inventoried. Swabs were also taken from the ski mask recovered from his pocket. DNA analyst

[351 Ill.Dec. 77 , 949 N.E.2d 1172]

Christina Caccamo received and performed DNA tests on the swabs. She concluded that the ski mask contained a mixture of the DNA profiles of at least three people, and one of the profiles matched Tolentino's to a reasonable degree of scientific certainty.

For the purpose of the armed habitual criminal charge, the State presented certified copies of Tolentino's conviction for an October 11, 2001, robbery (No. 01 CR 21944) and a May 31, 2005, conviction for delivery of a controlled substance (No. 05 CR 01056–01).

Raphael Polanco, Tolentino's cousin, testified for the defense. He stated that on December 16, 2005, he was driving his...

To continue reading

Request your trial
25 cases
  • People v. Phagan
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • April 30, 2019
    ...People v. Smith , 2012 IL App (1st) 102354, ¶¶ 107-16, 365 Ill.Dec. 302, 978 N.E.2d 324 ; People v. Tolentino , 409 Ill. App. 3d 598, 603-06, 351 Ill.Dec. 72, 949 N.E.2d 1167 (2011). He asks us to depart from those decisions.¶ 83 The State asks that we follow Smith and Tolentino and find th......
  • People v. Jackson
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • May 18, 2018
    ...panel of this court has explained that the Douglas court's analysis of section 8–4(c) was dicta . People v. Tolentino , 409 Ill. App. 3d 598, 606, 351 Ill.Dec. 72, 949 N.E.2d 1167 (2011) (finding Douglas 's discussion of section 8–4(c)dicta and explaining that "[t]he main issue in Douglas c......
  • People v. Smith
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • October 25, 2012
    ...been considered by the legislature and are accounted for by the 20–to 80–year sentencing range. See People v. Tolentino, 409 Ill.App.3d 598, 606, 351 Ill.Dec. 72, 949 N.E.2d 1167 (2011). ¶ 115 After Douglas, this court concluded in Tolentino, 409 Ill.App.3d at 606, 351 Ill.Dec. 72, 949 N.E.......
  • People v. Bailey, 1–09–1020.
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • May 23, 2011
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT