People v. Valentin, 82-1608
Decision Date | 12 July 1985 |
Docket Number | No. 82-1608,82-1608 |
Citation | 480 N.E.2d 1351,135 Ill.App.3d 22,89 Ill.Dec. 608 |
Parties | , 89 Ill.Dec. 608 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Salvador VALENTIN, Defendant-Appellant. |
Court | United States Appellate Court of Illinois |
Richard M. Daley, State's Atty. of Cook County, Chicago (Michael E. Shabat and James S. Veldman, Asst. State's Attys., Chicago, for plaintiff-appellee.
After a jury trial, defendantSalvador Valentin was convicted of possession of a controlled substance and possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance (Ill.Rev.Stat.1981, ch. 56 1/2, pars. 1401, 1402 and 1204(c)(12)(heroin) ), and was sentenced to 25 years imprisonment.Defendant maintains that the trial court erred in refusing to quash his arrest and suppress evidence seized in connection therewith; that the State failed to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; that the trial court erred in rejecting jury instructions submitted by defendant; and that the prosecutor prejudiced the jury with improper argument.The following facts are pertinent to our disposition.
In his complaint for a search warrant, Detective John Corcoran stated that he had known his informant for five months and had received correct information about narcotics from him on each of eight separate occasions.Corcoran further stated:
At 4:15 p.m. on October 2, 1981, Judge Stephen Schiller issued a search warrant for the first-floor and basement apartments of 1741 North Cicero Avenue.The warrant authorized the search of a man known as "Julio," described as a white male, 25 to 30 years old, 5'11"'', 150 to 160 lbs. with a light moustache and short, black, wavy hair.The warrant also authorized a search for heroin and for proof of residence.
At approximately 9:30 p.m. on Friday, October 2, 1981, the Chicago police executed the search warrant, and in the course of the search, arrested defendant.During a hearing on defendant's motion to quash the arrest and suppress evidence, two detectives testified that they knocked on the door to the first-floor apartment, heard noises inside, then forced the door open.Both detectives stated that as they entered, defendant was moving from the living room toward the dining room, away from the front door.Defendant was placed on the couch, and a woman and two small children were ordered to remain seated in the living room while the police conducted their search.
Defendant testified at the hearing that he lived in the basement apartment at 1741 North Cicero.He said that his name was not Julio, that he had nothing to do with the drugs seized, and that he did not pay rent, utilities, or any other bills for the first-floor apartment.Defendant stated that on October 2, 1981, he was visiting the lady who lived in the first-floor apartment, whose name he did not know.His first knowledge of the police came when they broke the door.When they entered defendant was seated on the sofa.He stood up and they sat him down.Cross-examination produced this colloquy:
[ASSISTANT STATE'S ATTORNEY] You are five foot eleven inches tall, are you not?
[DEFENDANT] More or less.
Q.And you were that height and weight or about that height and weight on October 2, 1981, weren't you?
A.I do not remember.
Q.Your hair was black on that date, wasn't it?
A.My hair is brown.
Q.Very dark brown, isn't it?
A.Yes, the way it is now.
Q.And your hair was wavy on that date, wasn't it?
A.No.
Q.Was your hair as wavy then as it is today?
A.Yes.[DEFENSE COUNSEL]Objection, Judge, the defendant's hair is straight, not wavy.
THE COURT: It's got a wave on the side, very noticeable wave.Turn so your lawyer can see.
[ASSISTANT STATE'S ATTORNEY] You were between 25 and 30 years of age on October 2, 1981, weren't you?
A.Yes.
The trial court denied defendant's motion to quash the arrest.
At trial, Detective John Corcoran testified that the officers executing the search warrant first knocked and announced their offices, then they heard noises and broke the door down.Corcoran saw a woman on the couch and saw defendant moving from the couch toward the dining room, away from the front door.He later learned that the woman's name was Digna Tirado.Corcoran searched the rear bedroom, which apparently belonged to the two small children.On a shelf in the closet, he found a large brown paper bag containing twelve cylindrical objects wrapped in duct tape.Corcoran opened one cylinder, discovered brown powder, and exclaimed "Holy s---!"He heard a disturbance in the front of the apartment, and went to the living room where he saw defendant being forcibly subdued.
Officer Frank Goff testified that he and several other police officers approached 1741 North Cicero at about 9:30 p.m. on October 2, 1981.They knocked on the door to the first-floor apartment, announced themselves, heard activity inside, and forced the door open.Goff stated that defendant was moving from the living room to the dining room when they entered; the police grabbed him and placed him on the couch.Detective Hamel stood watch over defendant, a Latin woman, and two small children while Goff searched the front bedroom.He saw a variety of both men's and women's clothing throughout the bedroom, and he found defendant's driver's license in the breast pocket of a black suitcoat with white pin stripes.Goff testified that he heard officers in the kitchen yelling that they had found a big bag, and at the same time he heard detective Hamel yell "Stop!"Goff saw defendant running toward the kitchen, and...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
People v. Rivas
... ... People v. Valentin, 135 Ill.App.3d 22, 89 Ill.Dec. 608, 480 N.E.2d 1351 (1985) ... In the present case, it was not unreasonable for the jury to have ... ...
-
People v. Herron
... ... (People v. Valentin (1985), 135 Ill.App.3d 22, 31 [89 Ill.Dec. 608, 615], 480 N.E.2d 1351, 1358.) As a result, narcotics being found on the [218 Ill.App.3d 570] ... ...
-
Grames v. Illinois State Police
... ... Page 953 ... [192 Ill.Dec. 798] 1437, 1444, 4 L.Ed.2d 1669, 1677; People v. Dowery (1975), 62 Ill.2d 200, 203, 340 N.E.2d 529, 531.) Despite the rule's broad deterrent ... (People v. Valentin (1985), 135 Ill.App.3d 22, 31, 89 Ill.Dec. 608, 615, 480 N.E.2d 1351, 1358.) As a result, ... ...
-
People v. Ray
... ... 853, 82 S.Ct. 939, 8 L.Ed.2d 12; People v. Griffin (1990), 194 Ill.App.3d 286, 141 Ill.Dec. 198, 550 N.E.2d 1244; People v. Valentin (1985), 135 Ill.App.3d 22, 89 Ill.Dec. 608, 480 N.E.2d 1351.) These elements can be proven by a showing of actual possession which is established ... ...