People v. Wade
| Decision Date | 16 April 1987 |
| Docket Number | 87137,Docket Nos. 86430 |
| Citation | 157 Mich.App. 481,403 N.W.2d 578 |
| Parties | PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Monica WADE, Defendant-Appellee. PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Monica WADE, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US |
Frank J. Kelley, Atty. Gen., Louis J. Caruso, Sol. Gen., John D. O'Hair, Pros. Atty., Timothy A. Baughman, Deputy Chief, Civil and Appeals, Virginia Hazen, Asst. Pros. Atty., for the People.
Cornelius Pitts, Detroit, for defendant.
Before BRONSON, P.J., and R.B. BURNS and TOWNSEND, * JJ.
Two cases involving the attempted criminal prosecution of defendant and the attempted forfeiture of defendant's vehicle have been consolidated for appeal. In case number 86430, the people appeal from a July 8, 1985, order suppressing as evidence marihuana obtained in a search without a warrant of a vehicle after impoundment, entered in Detroit Recorder's Court. In case number 87137, defendant appeals from a Detroit Recorder's Court order entered August 16, 1985, setting aside a previous order for the return of property to defendant. A forfeiture proceeding was pending in the Wayne Circuit Court as to such property.
The instant prosecution arose from an offense allegedly committed on December 24, 1983, at approximately 3:50 p.m. At that time, at the intersection of Smith and Brush in the City of Detroit, Officer David Haddon of the Detroit Police Department observed two occupants of a 1984 Lincoln Continental Mark VII, bearing license plate 331 JAH, exit from the vehicle possessing guns. Officer Haddon saw the two individuals walk into an alley, fire the guns, and then return to the car and drive away. Officer Haddon relayed this information to the 13th precinct, which in turn announced it over the police radio system to the area units.
Soon thereafter, Officer Joseph O'Brien spotted the automobile matching the radio description two to three blocks away from the intersection of Smith and Brush and followed it to the corner of Harmon and Woodward, where two of the occupants left the car and walked into a store. When these two individuals came out of the store a short time later, Officer O'Brien arrested them and searched through the purse possessed by the female, identified as defendant. In the purse, O'Brien found a .25 caliber gun. Then, O'Brien instructed the two occupants remaining in the car to come out, whereupon O'Brien conducted pat- down searches but found nothing. The vehicle was not searched at that time.
After the arrests, the four individuals and the vehicle were transported to the 13th precinct police station. After being impounded, the vehicle was taken to the station's garage and was searched for the first time by Officer Lawrence Raynor. Officer Raynor testified that he found several bags of marihuana weighing a total of 272.1 grams in the trunk of the automobile during his search of the vehicle. The search was conducted without a warrant.
On January 20, 1984, approximately one month after this search, the people filed a petition for forfeiture of the vehicle, pursuant to M.C.L. Sec. 333.7523; M.S.A. Sec. 14.15(7523), in the Wayne Circuit Court. In that civil action, Wayne Circuit Court Chief Judge Richard Dunn issued an order to show cause, which directed, inter alia, that the vehicle remain in the custody of the Detroit Police Department until the conclusion of the action or until otherwise directed by the circuit court.
Defendant was charged with carrying a concealed weapon M.C.L. Sec. 750.227; M.S.A. Sec. 28.424, and possession of marihuana with intent to deliver, M.C.L. Sec. 333.7401(2)(c); M.S.A. Sec. 14.15(7401)(2)(c).
On July 8, 1985, the Recorder's Court judge issued an opinion and order suppressing the evidence and quashing the information.
On July 9, 1985, the Recorder's Court judge issued an addendum order directing the police to return the vehicle to defendant. On the same date the people filed a motion to set aside the addendum order. The motion was heard on August 16, 1985. On August 22, 1985, the Recorder's Court judge entered an order granting the people's motion to set aside the addendum order. Defendant appeals therefrom.
The trial court's ruling, which suppressed as evidence marihuana discovered in the trunk of the vehicle after impoundment, will not be set aside unless the reviewing court determines that the ruling was clearly erroneous. See People v. Castle, 126 Mich.App. 203, 207, 337 N.W.2d 48 (1983), and cases cited therein. When a search is conducted without a warrant the state bears the burden of proving that the search was justified by a recognized exception to the rule requiring a warrant.
Because the suppression involved marihuana seized outside the curtilage of a dwelling house, we must look to Const. 1963, art. I, Sec. 11 which provides in part as follows:
"The provisions of this section shall not be construed to bar from evidence in any criminal proceeding any narcotic drug, firearm, bomb, explosive or any other dangerous weapon, seized by a peace officer outside the curtilage of any dwelling house in this state."
The Michigan Supreme Court in the case of People v. Moore, 391 Mich. 426, 435, 216 N.W.2d 770 (1974):
"While Constitution 1963, art I, Sec. 11 protects against 'unreasonable searches and seizures', its proviso prohibiting the exclusion from evidence of 'any narcotic drug, firearm, bomb, explosive or any other dangerous weapon, seized by a peace officer outside the curtilage of any dwelling house', precludes a construction of the Michigan search and seizure clause imposing a higher standard of reasonableness for searches and seizures of items named in the proviso than the United States Supreme Court has held applicable under the Fourth Amendment."
Thus, United States Supreme Court decisions control this issue. An unbroken line of United States Supreme Court cases beginning with Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 90 S.Ct. 1975, 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1970), and including the more recent decisions of Michigan v. Thomas, 458 U.S. 259, 102 S.Ct. 3079, 73 L.Ed.2d 750 (1982), and Florida v. Meyers, 466 U.S. 380, 104 S.Ct. 1852, 80 L.Ed.2d 381 (1984), have held that when officers have probable cause to believe there is contraband inside an automobile, the officers may conduct a search of the vehicle without a warrant even after it has been impounded and is in police custody.
I...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Mayes, Docket No. 112076
...of showing that the search was justified by a recognized exception to the warrant requirement. Reed, supra; People v. Wade, 157 Mich.App. 481, 485, 403 N.W.2d 578 (1987). Here, the prosecutor argues that the search of the automobile without a warrant was justified under the automobile excep......
-
People v. Davis
...burden to show that the search and seizure were justified by a recognized exception to the warrant requirement. People v. Wade, 157 Mich.App. 481, 485, 403 N.W.2d 578 (1987). This Court will not reverse a trial court's decision following a suppression hearing unless it is clearly erroneous.......
-
People v. Malone, Docket No. 102213
...of showing that the search and seizure were justified by a recognized exception to the warrant requirement. People v. Wade, 157 Mich.App. 481, 485, 403 N.W.2d 578 (1987). The prosecution in this case relied on the consent exception to the warrant requirement. The consent exception allows se......
-
People v. Galloway, Docket No. 241804.
...search and seizure challenged by a defendant were justified by a recognized exception to the warrant requirement. People v. Wade, 157 Mich.App. 481, 485, 403 N.W.2d 578 (1987). III. Plain View The people argue that the trial court improperly suppressed evidence of the 122 marijuana plants b......