People v. Wallace

CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
Writing for the CourtBefore GREEN
CitationPeople v. Wallace, 615 N.Y.S.2d 194, 206 A.D.2d 825 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Decision Date15 July 1994
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Rafael WALLACE, Appellant.

Edward J. Nowak by Stephen Bird, Rochester, for appellant.

Howard R. Relin by Wendy Lehman, Rochester, for respondent.

Before GREEN, J.P., and BALIO, LAWTON, WESLEY and BOEHM, JJ.

MEMORANDUM:

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree with intent to sell and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree. County Court properly denied defendant's request to instruct the jury on the defense of agency. Testimony by prosecution witnesses revealed that an undercover officer parked his vehicle in front of a targeted residence and sounded his horn twice. Defendant, who was standing in the street, approached the officer and asked, "What's up?" The officer stated that he needed help, that he was looking for a "dime". Defendant asked how many bags he wanted, thereby indicating that he understood the officer's statement. Defendant entered the residence and returned a short time later with a gray ziplock bag containing a substance later determined to be cocaine. The officer handed defendant $10 in exchange for the bag, and defendant walked toward the back of the residence and thereafter left the area. The money was not found on defendant when he was arrested a short time later. The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to defendant, fails to support an inference that defendant was acting solely as an agent for the buyer, a complete stranger (see, People v. Herring, 83 N.Y.2d 780, 782-783, 610 N.Y.S.2d 949, 632 N.E.2d 1272). Further, the agency defense does not apply to the offense of criminal possession in the seventh degree (see, People v. Sierra, 45 N.Y.2d 56, 407 N.Y.S.2d 669, 379 N.E.2d 196; People...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • People v. Hicks
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 18, 1996
    ...(see, People v. Seifert, 209 A.D.2d 555, 619 N.Y.S.2d 86, lv. denied 85 N.Y.2d 914, 627 N.Y.S.2d 337, 650 N.E.2d 1339; People v. Wallace, 206 A.D.2d 825, 615 N.Y.S.2d 194, lv. denied 84 N.Y.2d 834, 617 N.Y.S.2d 154, 641 N.E.2d 175; People v. Cole, 165 A.D.2d 737, 564 N.Y.S.2d 263, lv. denie......
  • Hamburger v. Rieselman
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 28, 1994
  • People v. South
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 8, 1996
    ...the buyer, a complete stranger (see, People v. Herring, 83 N.Y.2d 780, 782-783, 610 N.Y.S.2d 949, 632 N.E.2d 1272)" (People v. Wallace, 206 A.D.2d 825, 826, 615 N.Y.S.2d 194, lv. denied 84 N.Y.2d 834, 617 N.Y.S.2d 154, 641 N.E.2d 175). Evidence that defendant may have been acting as a middl......
  • People v. Wallace
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • August 31, 1994
    ...154 617 N.Y.S.2d 154 84 N.Y.2d 834, 641 N.E.2d 175 People v. Wallace Court of Appeals of New York Aug 31, 1994 Titone, J. 206 A.D.2d 825, 615 N.Y.S.2d 194 App.Div. 4, Monroe Denied. ...