People v. Warren, Docket No. 6240
Citation | 23 Mich.App. 20,178 N.W.2d 127 |
Decision Date | 27 March 1970 |
Docket Number | Docket No. 6240,No. 1,1 |
Parties | PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. McArthur WARREN, Defendant-Appellant |
Court | Court of Appeal of Michigan (US) |
Carl Levin, Arthur J. Tarnow, Detroit, for appellant.
Frank J. Kelley, Atty. Gen., Robert A. Derengoski, Sol. Gen., William L. Cahalan, Pros. Atty., Dominick R. Carnovale, Chief, Appellate Div., Thomas P. Smith, Asst. Pros. Atty., for appellee.
Before LESINSKI, C.J., and QUINN and V. J. BRENNAN, JJ.
Defendant McArthur Warren was convicted by the trial court, after waiving his right to jury trial, of larceny from a person. M.C.L.A. § 750.357 (Stat.Ann.1954 Rev. § 28.589). Defendant brings this appeal as of right.
At trial the details of defendant's juvenile record were admitted into evidence over defendant's objection for the purpose of impeaching defendant's credibility.
It is defendant's position on appeal that admission of his juvenile record constituted reversible error. We agree.
The statute governing the instant case is M.C.L.A. § 712A.23 (Stat.Ann.1962 Rev. § 27.3178(598.23)), which provides:
'A disposition of any child under this chapter, or any evidence given in such case, shall not in any civil, criminal or any other cause or proceeding whatever in any court, be lawful or proper evidence against such child for any purpose whatever, except in subsequent cases against the same child under this chapter.'
The purpose behind the statute was set out in People v. Smallwood (1943), 306 Mich. 49, 10 N.W.2d 303. There the Court stated at 53, 10 N.W.2d at 304:
Defendant also attacks the sufficiency of the evidence and testimony which indicated that he made no statement after he was advised of his constitutional rights by the police. An examination of the record reveals that evidence was introduced which if believed by the trier of fact, was sufficient to sustain...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Jackson
...Likewise, the Court of Appeals has barred impeachment of a defendant through the use of his juvenile record, People v. Warren, 23 Mich.App. 20, 178 N.W.2d 127 (1970); People v. Smallwood, 306 Mich. 49, 10 N.W.2d 303 (1943), and held in People v. Farrar, 36 Mich.App. 294, 193 N.W.2d 363 (197......
-
People v. Wasson
...M.C.L.A. § 712A.23 (Stat.Ann.1962 Rev. § 27.3178(598.23)); People v. Smallwood (1943), 306 Mich. 49, 10 N.W.2d 303; People v. Warren (1970), 23 Mich.App. 20, 178 N.W.2d 127; 1 Underhill's Criminal Evidence (5th ed. 1956) § 244, p. 607, note The prejudicial error committed below requires rev......
-
People v. Hammond, Docket No. 7413
...306 Mich. 49, 53, 10 N.W.2d 303, 304, quoting State v. Guerrero (1942), 58 Ariz. 421, 120 P.2d 798. See, also: People v. Warren (1970), 23 Mich.App. 20, 178 N.W.2d 127. The testimony at the instant juvenile hearing was designed to determine whether the 'youthful errors' were indeed 'youthfu......
-
People v. Edwards
...that juvenile proceedings are not, by definition, criminal actions. M.C.L.A. § 712A.1; M.S.A. § 27.3178(598.1). Cf. People v. Warren, 23 Mich.App. 20, 178 N.W.2d 127 (1970).4 I find nothing in McKeiver that suggets that because juvenile proceedings are labeled noncriminal in nature, they th......