People v. Wasco, Cr. 1314
| Citation | 314 P.2d 558,153 Cal.App.2d 485 |
| Decision Date | 28 August 1957 |
| Docket Number | Cr. 1314 |
| Court | California Court of Appeals |
| Parties | PEOPLE of the State of California, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. John Joseph WASCO, Defendant and Appellant. |
Stephen C. Johnson, San Diego, for appellant.
Edmund G. Brown, Atty. Gen., William E. James, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent.
The defendant was charged with the possession of a narcotic, heroin, in violation of section 11500 of the Health & Safety Code. He was also charged with two prior convictions, one for first degree burglary and the other for possession of a narcotic. He pleaded not guilty but admitted the prior convictions. A jury trial was waived and the court found him guilty as charged. He was sentenced to imprisonment, it being ordered that the sentence run concurrently with an unexpired term on which he had been released on parole. He has appealed from the judgment.
On appellant's request for the appointment of counsel this court appointed the same attorney who had represented him at the trial. This attorney has filed a report stating that after a careful review of the record and the law he has been unable to find any arguable grounds for a successful appeal. This report further states that the appellant relies on the contentions that the physical objects which were admitted into evidence were erroneously admitted because they were obtained by an unlawful search and seizure; that the testimony of the arresting officers should be disregarded because it is apparent from that testimony that they were prejudiced against the appellant; and that the court committed reversible error in refusing to require a police officer to identify the 'informer'.
The attorney general has filed a memorandum with a review of the evidence and a full discussion of the points suggested by the appellant, and citing many cases supporting the views there expressed. After reading the entire record we are in accord with the conclusion reached by the appointed counsel and the attorney general. We find no reversible error in the record and nothing which would indicate in any way that a miscarriage of justice has occurred.
Shortly after midnight, in the early morning of August 26, 1956, two police officers went to the room of the defendant in the Bell Hotel in San Diego. They had previously received confidential information that the defendant was in possession of narcotics. They knocked on the door and when a man asked who it was they replied The defendant opened the door and asked what they wanted. He was shown a badge and was told that they had information that he was in possession of narcotics. The defendant was then asked if he minded if the officers looked around the room. The defendant replied The officers entered and began to search the room. They noticed a piece of lined white paper on the bed on top of a newspaper. The newspaper had several slashes as though it had been cut with a razor. A piece had been cut out of one corner of this white paper. A tablet of this same paper was on a stand in the room. One of the officers then went to an improvised wash room at the end of the hallway on which this room faced. The partition separating this washroom from the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Priestly v. Superior Court of City and County of San Francisco
...informer whose communications are relied upon to establish probable cause to make a search is sound and workable. See People v. Wasco, 153 Cal.App.2d 485, 488, 314 P.2d 558; People v. Lundy, 151 Cal.App.2d 244, 249, 311 P.2d 601; People v. Dewson, 150 Cal.App.2d 119, 136, 310 P.2d 162; Peop......
-
State v. Dolce
...168 Cal.App.2d 452, 336 P.2d 266 (D.Ct.App.1959), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 843, 80 S.Ct. 96, 4 L.Ed.2d 82 (1959); People v. Wasco, 153 Cal.App.2d 485, 314 P.2d 558 (D.Ct.App.1957); People v. Dewson, 150 Cal.App.2d 119, 310 P.2d 162 (D.Ct.App.1957); People v. Outten, supra; State v. Hochman, 2......
-
Klor v. Hannon
...on which defendant's room faced, held reasonably incident to arrest which was accomplished in rented room, People v. Wasco, 153 Cal. App.2d 485, 487, 314 P.2d 558, 560 (1957). Search of an area 20 feet from house in which defendant arrested, held permissible, People v. Montes, 146 Cal. App.......
-
People v. Rogers
...appellant's room or in an outbuilding to which he had access. Cf. Sayers v. United States, 9 Cir., 2 F.2d 146. 'In People v. Wasco, 153 Cal.App.2d 485, 487, 314 P.2d 558, the officers arrested the defendant in his rented room. Thereafter, the officers searched for and discovered contraband ......