People v. Weintraub
Decision Date | 13 February 1973 |
Citation | 340 N.Y.S.2d 675,41 A.D.2d 660 |
Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Alan WEINTRAUB, Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Before RABIN, P.J., and HOPKINS, MUNDER, MARTUSCELLO and CHRIST, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Appeals by defendant(1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered February 18, 1972, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree, upon a plea of guilty, and sentencing him to an indeterminate prison term of not more than three years, to be served concurrently with another sentence defendant was then serving, and (2) by permission from an order of the same court, dated March 15, 1972, which denied, without a hearing, defendant's application in the nature of a writ of error Coram nobis to vacate said judgment.
Judgment affirmed, without prejudice to the claims asserted in the Coram nobis application.No opinion.
Order reversed, on the law, and application granted to the extent of granting a hearing, to be held at the Criminal Term before a Justice other than the one who presided at the guilty pleading and the sentencing.
Defendant was convicted on his plea of guilty on January 24, 1972 and sentenced on February 18, 1972.On or about February 25, 1972he brought this Coram nobis...
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
People v. Seminara
...of an off-the-record promise of probation (see People v. Picciotti, 4 N.Y.2d 340, 175 N.Y.S.2d 32, 151 N.E.2d 191; People v. Weintraub, 41 A.D.2d 660, 340 N.Y.S.2d 675; People v. Barner, 39 A.D.2d 985, 333 N.Y.S.2d 182). The hearing should be conducted before a County Court Judge other than......
-
People v. Douglas
...On this record, defendants have clearly made a showing sufficient to entitle them to a hearing on their allegations (People v. Weintraub, 41 A.D.2d 660, 340 N.Y.S.2d 660). All ...
- People v. Willis
-
People v. Dombrowski
...and there is no basis to permit its withdrawal (People v. Selikoff, 35 N.Y.2d 227, 360 N.Y.S.2d 623, 318 N.E.2d 784; People v. Weintraub, 41 A.D.2d 660, 340 N.Y.S.2d 675; People v. Wright, 20 A.D.2d 857, 248 N.Y.S.2d Judgment unanimously affirmed. ...