People v. Whitfield

Decision Date07 October 2021
Docket Number14322,Ind. No. 3405/15,Case No. 2018–4517
Citation198 A.D.3d 446,152 N.Y.S.3d 571 (Mem)
Parties The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William WHITFIELD, Defendant–Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Emilia King–Musza of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Reva Grace Phillips of counsel), for respondent.

Manzanet–Daniels, J.P., Mazzarelli, Moulton, Gonza´lez,Pitt, JJ.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ralph Fabrizio, J.), rendered April 17, 2018, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of aggravated assault on a police officer or peace officer, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 11 years, unanimously affirmed.

We find that defendant's plea was knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered, notwithstanding the court's misstatement, immediately before the plea was entered, that the maximum sentencing exposure was 30 years, when in fact it was 25 years. In general, misinformation about sentencing exposure may invalidate a guilty plea (see e. g. People v. Buchanan, 194 A.D.3d 655, 147 N.Y.S.3d 53 [1st Dept. 2021], lv denied 37 N.Y.3d 970, 150 N.Y.S.3d 688, 172 N.E.3d 800 [2021] ; People v. Joseph, 191 A.D.3d 148, 137 N.Y.S.3d 31 [1st Dept. 2020], lv denied 36 N.Y.3d 1121, 146 N.Y.S.3d 199, 169 N.E.3d 557 [2021] ; People v. Johnson, 160 A.D.3d 516, 518, 76 N.Y.S.3d 18 [1st Dept. 2018] ).

Here, however, we find that the court's misstatement did not render the plea involuntary under the totality of the circumstances (see People v. Garcia, 92 N.Y.2d 869, 870, 677 N.Y.S.2d 772, 700 N.E.2d 311 [1998] ). In particular, the record demonstrates that defendant was ready to accept the plea before the court misspoke about the maximum sentence. We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining arguments regarding the validity of his plea.

Defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal (see People v. Thomas, 34 N.Y.3d 545, 122 N.Y.S.3d 226, 144 N.E.3d 970 [2019], cert denied 589 U.S. ––––, 140 S. Ct. 2634, 206 L.Ed.2d 512 [2020] ; People v. Bryant, 28 N.Y.3d 1094, 1096, 45 N.Y.S.3d 335, 68 N.E.3d 60 [2016] ), which forecloses review of his excessive sentence claim. Regardless of whether defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal, we perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Defendant was convicted before the enactment of CPL 420.35(2–a), which permits the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • People v. Attah
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 23, 2022
  • People v. Acevedo
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 30, 2022
  • People v. Medina
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 7, 2021
  • People v. Elliot
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 7, 2021
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT