People v. Williams
| Decision Date | 02 February 1888 |
| Parties | PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS |
| Court | Idaho Supreme Court |
APPEAL from Third Judicial District, Bingham County.
Affirmed.
No Counsel for Appellant.
R. Z. Johnson, for the People.
No brief filed in the case.
OPINION
This appeal is here in the same condition as the appeal in People v. Woods, ante, p. 364, 2 Idaho 364, 16 P. 551, just decided by this court. The facts are also similar, and a like verdict and judgment were obtained in the trial court.
We have in this case examined the record, and discovered no substantial error. The judgment of the district court is affirmed, and it is ordered that the judgment here be certified and remitted to the trial court, and said court is directed to make such order as may be necessary to carry its judgment into effect.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Broadbent v. Brumback
... ... Doe, 8 Blackf. 140, ... 44 Am. Dec. 760; Billingsley v. Dean, 11 Ind. 331; ... Lawrence v. Cowles, 13 Ill. 577; Sumner v ... People, 29 N.Y. 337; Bank v. Curtiss, 19 Johns ... 326; Tyler on Usury, 210 ... The ... appellants urge that the court erred in not finding ... ...
-
State v. Hunsaker
...verdict and will further assume that the trial court's charge to the jury was pertinent to the facts proved on the trial. (People v. Williams, 2 Idaho 366, 16 P. 552; v. Woods, 2 Idaho 364, 16 P. 551.) Where an appeal is perfected by bill of exceptions this court will not consider the suffi......