People v. Wilson

Citation291 Ill.Dec. 615,214 Ill.2d 127,824 N.E.2d 191
Decision Date21 January 2005
Docket NumberNo. 97354.,97354.
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. David E. WILSON, Appellant.
CourtIllinois Supreme Court

Daniel M. Kirwan, Deputy Defender, and Nancy L. Vincent, Assistant Defender, of the Office of the State Appellate Defender, Mt. Vernon, for appellant.

Lisa Madigan, Attorney General, Springfield, and Stan Brandmeyer, State's Attorney, Carlyle (Gary Feinerman, Solicitor General, and Linda D. Woloshin and Jay Paul Hoffmann, Assistant Attorneys General, Chicago, of counsel), for the People.

Justice THOMAS delivered the opinion of the court:

A jury convicted defendant, David E. Wilson, of two counts of aggravated criminal sexual abuse (720 ILCS 5/12-16(f) (West 2000)). Defendant appealed, arguing that the circuit court of Clinton County had erred in allowing the State to introduce other-crimes evidence from two witnesses whose testimony about defendant's conduct toward them was similar to the circumstances surrounding the two charged offenses, but where defendant denied any sexual touching of the alleged victims. The appellate court affirmed defendant's convictions, with one justice dissenting. 343 Ill.App.3d 742, 278 Ill.Dec. 388, 798 N.E.2d 772. We allowed defendant's petition for leave to appeal. 177 Ill.2d R. 315.

BACKGROUND

At the time of the alleged offenses, defendant was employed by Central High School in Breese, Illinois. His primary duties were to supervise students during in-school suspensions and to act as an assistant football coach. The two alleged victims were students at the high school. Count I of the information filed against defendant charged that he knowingly touched Carol Z.'s breasts for the purpose of sexual gratification, and count II charged that he knowingly touched Crystal H.'s breasts for the purpose of sexual gratification. Prior to trial, defendant filed a motion in limine to exclude testimony from Lisa V. and Ashley A., two other female high school students who had come forward to claim that defendant had sexually abused them in ways similar to the charged offenses. Defendant alleged that both students' testimony would involve uncharged conduct and that the State had not disclosed Ashley A.'s identity to defendant until three days prior to the scheduled trial date. The trial court denied defendant's motion, and the case proceeded to trial.

During defendant's opening statement, defense counsel told the jury that witnesses against the defendant would complain about conduct of defendant that occurred mostly in a third-period art class. He further stated that to show that the alleged touching did not happen, he would present the testimony of a teacher and several students of that class who would testify that they had not observed any physical contact between defendant and the two alleged victims. Defense counsel then acknowledged that there would be some evidence presented that would show that defendant touched people. He then told the jury that "that's the type of person [defendant] is, that he will occasionally shake people's hands, that he pats them on the back." Defense counsel concluded his opening remarks by telling the jury "that if there was ever any type of contact whatsoever between my client and any of these people who are going to make complaints against him here that it was simply incidental contact and it had absolutely no sexual nature whatsoever."

Crystal H. testified that in March 2001, when she was a 14-year-old high school freshman, she received an in-school suspension. The in-school suspension room was furnished with desks separated by room dividers to form cubicles. Crystal was seated at one of these desks serving a suspension when defendant approached her from behind and placed his hands around her waist. He then moved his hands up from under her stomach to touch her breasts from underneath. As he touched her breasts, he whispered into her ear, asking her what she was doing there. At the time, there was only one other person in the room—a student in another cubicle. She noted that defendant had touched her on other occasions, but this was the only time he touched her breasts.

Crystal further testified that after the incident in the in-school suspension room, defendant touched her on at least 10 other occasions during art class. On those occasions, defendant came up from behind her and placed his hands around her stomach with his crotch area close to her body. She observed defendant hug other girls in the same way in the art room. She later told several of her friends, including Carol Z., about what had happened. On March 21, 2001, Crystal passed a note to another student, describing what defendant had done to her. The note stated, "I was sitting in ISS and the teacher comes up behind me and tries to touch me. What a pervert." The note was intercepted by a teacher and taken to the principal. That day, Crystal told the principal about defendant's conduct and gave a statement to the police. At that time, Crystal did not know anything about Lisa V.

Carol Z. testified that when she was a 15-year-old sophomore during the 2000-01 school year, defendant made physical contact with her in the art room and hallways some 15 times. Some of these times he approached from behind, but other times he approached from the front. On some occasions, he hugged her; on others, he held her hand or touched her lower back. Sometimes he touched her eyes or her lips or brushed her hair out of her face. She further testified that defendant touched both her breasts and her buttocks, noting that he was always "subtle," touching her in such a way that others would not be able to see that he was doing anything more than hugging her. She also stated that, on one occasion, defendant asked her about her sex life, which made her feel uncomfortable.

Carol further testified that after Crystal's note was intercepted, Carol told the principal what had happened to her and gave a statement to police. She had noticed defendant touching other girls, but did not know if he had touched them on the breasts. However, a number of other girls, including Ranee T., Mica H., Natalie J. and Rachel J., told her that the same thing had happened to them. When questioned, however, those girls did not want to have any part of the case and would not talk about it. Carol did not know about Lisa V.'s complaints about defendant.

Lisa V. testified to three incidents of sexual contact with defendant that took place in the fall semester of 2000, when she was a 17-year-old junior. The first time, she was seated at a desk in study hall, when defendant approached her from behind, grabbed her sides, and then put his fingers under her breasts so that the sides of his index fingers touched her breasts. The second time was also in study hall, and the defendant did the same thing he did the first time. He then sat across from her, winked at her, and took her daily planner and drew a picture of a little devil and wrote next to it, "Lisa is a horny devil." The third incident occurred during a makeup test for chemistry class just before Christmas break. Defendant was acting as a proctor to make sure that Lisa did not cheat on the test. During the test, defendant twice approached her from behind and rubbed her shoulders and breasts. He then approached her from the left side, put his right hand on her back, and rubbed his crotch against her arm. She stated that "there was an obvious bulge in his pants" when he did this. After the holiday break and after consulting with her family about the problem, she reported the incident to a school counselor. Defendant later received a letter of reprimand from the school authorities over the matter.

Ashley A. testified about two incidents that occurred with the defendant, the first when she was a sophomore in the spring of 2000 and the second when she was a junior in November of 2000. The first physical contact defendant made with her took place in the art room where she had gone to draw when no class was in session there. She was sitting at a stool, drawing, when defendant came up from behind her, brushed his hand against her back, and then stood very close to her and "rubbed his genital area against her leg." The second incident took place in study hall. There, she showed a group of friends a new tattoo she had gotten on her shoulder. She wore a shirt over a tank top and had pulled the shirt back to expose the tattoo. Defendant approached the group, and she showed him the tattoo also. He came from behind her to look at it, then rubbed his hand against her breast. At the time, she thought it could have been accidental, but in retrospect, she believed it was intentional. After the last incident, she tried to avoid defendant as much as she could.

Sergeant Mike Kreke of the Clinton County sheriff's department talked to defendant in April 2001, and took a signed, written statement from him, which is as follows: "It's not uncommon for me to put my hand on somebody's shoulder while talking to them. I will sometimes put my hand on the waist or back also. There is no sexual connotation. To me what I have done is not inappropriate conduct." Defendant also told the officer that he is a "touchy feely type person."

Defendant testified on his own behalf. He denied any sexual contact with the victims, but did not deny touching them. When asked if he had any contact with Crystal H. in the in-school suspension room, defendant answered that he "walked over and maybe put [his] hand on her arm and asked her if she had anything to do." He further testified that he could not have touched her in the way she described because the kind of chair she was sitting in made it impossible. A photograph of the desks and chairs used in the in-school suspension room was admitted into evidence. The photograph shows that the chair had a solid back, the height of which was level with the height of the desk. The chair did not have arms and was...

To continue reading

Request your trial
188 cases
  • People v. Watkins
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • January 21, 2015
    ...has been charged was not performed inadvertently, accidently, involuntarily, or without guilty knowledge. People v. Wilson, 214 Ill.2d 127, 136, 291 Ill.Dec. 615, 824 N.E.2d 191 (2005) ; see also Ill. R. Evid. 404(b) (eff. Jan. 1, 2011); Graham, supra § 404.5, at 241–71; Wigmore, supra §§ 3......
  • People v. Everhart
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • December 9, 2010
    ...116, 788 N.E.2d 707. “As factual similarities increase, so does the relevance or probative value.” People v. Wilson, 214 Ill.2d 127, 142, 291 Ill.Dec. 615, 824 N.E.2d 191 (2005). However, when the evidence is offered for some purpose other than modus operandi, “ ‘mere general areas of simil......
  • People v. Walston
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • November 12, 2008
    ...from two of the defendant's alleged previous victims was deemed admissible under common-law principles (People v. Wilson, 214 Ill.2d 127, 291 Ill.Dec. 615, 824 N.E.2d 191 (2005)). From these cases, Cardamone drew the rule that "a large volume may make probative other-crimes evidence [unfair......
  • People v. Cardamone
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • March 27, 2008
    ...at 358, 284 Ill.Dec. 435, 810 N.E.2d 88. The introduction of evidence of other crimes was upheld in People v. Wilson, 214 Ill.2d 127, 139, 291 Ill.Dec. 615, 824 N.E.2d 191 (2005). There, our supreme court affirmed the admission of other-crimes evidence from two witnesses who testified that ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Illinois Objections
    • May 1, 2013
    ...App 3d 175, 919 NE2d 1035 (3d Dist 2009), §§1:380, 1:390 People v. Wilson , 155 Ill 2d 374, 614 NE2d 1227 (1993), §1:30 People v. Wilson, 214 Ill 2d 127, 824 NE2d 191 (2005), §§1:270, 4:40 People v. Wilson , 254 Ill App 3d 1020, 626 NE2d 1282 (1993), §3:100 People v. Wilson , 302 Ill App 3d......
  • Procedures for Objections & Motions
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Illinois Objections
    • May 1, 2013
    ...types of matters in criminal cases: • Whether evidence of a defendant’s uncharged crimes is admissible at trial. People v. Wilson , 214 Ill 2d 127, 824 NE2d 191 (2005), abrogated by statute, People v. Chapman , 2012 Ill 111896, 965 NE2d 1119 (2012); People v. Donoho , 204 Ill 2d 159, 788 NE......
  • Relevance & Materiality
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Illinois Objections
    • May 1, 2013
    ...People v. Heard , 187 Ill 2d 36, 718 NE2d 58 (1999); People v. Nelson , 2013 Ill App (1st) 102619, ___ NE2d ___ (2013); People v. Wilson, 214 Ill 2d 127, 824 NE2d 191 (2005); People v. Harding, 401 Ill App 3d 482, 929 NE2d 597 (1st Dist 2010); People v. Richee , 355 Ill App 3d 43, 823 NE2d ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT