People v. Wright

Decision Date30 April 2001
Citation282 A.D.2d 768,724 N.Y.S.2d 351
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,<BR>v.<BR>BRUCE WRIGHT, Appellant.

O'Brien, J. P., S. Miller, Smith and Crane, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are either unpreserved for...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Wright v. Poole
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • December 12, 2014
    ...Violent Felony Offender. (See Resp.'s Ex. 42, at 3.) The Appellate Division affirmed Petitioner's conviction, see People v. Wright, 282 A.D.2d 768, 724 N.Y.S.2d 351 (2001), and the Court of Appeals denied Petitioner's request for leave to appeal, see People v. Wright, 96 N.Y.2d 943, 733 N.Y......
  • People v. Vasilaropoulos
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 30, 2001

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT