Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co, v. Beazer East Inc.
Docket Number | 14-3634 |
Decision Date | 21 September 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
9 cases
-
Dixon Lumber Co. v. Austinville Limestone Co.
...to Dixon. Indeed, the language here stands in stark contrast to that in a case relied upon by ALC, Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co. v. Beazer East, Inc. , 802 F.3d 876, 881 (7th Cir. 2015). (Dkt. No. 174 at 21.) There, the language expressly disclaimed "liability of any character" for Party A a......
-
Hobart Corp. v. Dayton Power & Light Co.
...their CERCLA liability, they have the right to obtain indemnification for that liability."); Peoples Gas Light and Coke Co. v. Beazer East, Inc. , 802 F.3d 876, 880 (7th Cir. 2015) ("responsible parties may not transfer their CERCLA liability, but may obtain indemnification for that liabili......
-
Induction Innovations, Inc. v. Pacholok
...the principal objective in construing a contract is "to give effect to the intent of the parties." Peoples Gas Light and Coke Co. v. Beazer East, Inc., 802 F.3d 876, 881 (7th Cir. 2015) (quoting Gallagher v. Lenart, 226 Ill.2d 208, 232 (2007)). The best indication of the parties' intent is ......
-
Holmes v. Godinez
...language, given its plain and ordinary meaning, is the best indication of the parties’ intent’ ...." Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co. v. Beazer E., Inc. , 802 F.3d 876, 881 (7th Cir. 2015) (alteration in original) (citation omitted) (quoting Gallagher v. Lenart , 226 Ill.2d 208, 314 Ill.Dec. 13......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
CHAPTER 17 ENVIRONMENTAL DUE DILIGENCE IN MINING TRANSACTIONS
...the corporate veil may be appropriate in fraudulent or improper circumstances). [35] Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co. v. Beazer East, Inc., 802 F.3d 876, 881 (7th Cir. 2015) (citations omitted). [36] 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a)(3). [37] Pakootas v. Tech Cominco Metals, Ltd., 830 F.3d 975 (9th Cir. 2016......