Peoria Life Ins. Co. of Peoria, Ill. v. Bergholm, 6042.
Decision Date | 05 June 1931 |
Docket Number | No. 6042.,6042. |
Parties | PEORIA LIFE INS. CO. OF PEORIA, ILL, v. BERGHOLM et al. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
J. I. Kilpatrick and Roscoe Wilson, both of Lubbock, Tex., for appellant.
E. L. Klett and Geo. R. Bean, both of Lubbock, Tex., for appellees.
Before BRYAN, FOSTER, and WALKER, Circuit Judges.
This was an action on a life insurance policy in the sum of $5,000, issued by appellant to Carl Oscar Bergholm, and naming his wife, Iris Christine Bergholm, as the beneficiary. That policy contained the usual provisions as to the payment of premiums, as to the policy ceasing and determining if any premium is not paid on the date when due, except as provided in the policy, and as to the policy continuing in force for the term of one month, of not less than thirty days, if any premium after the first one is not paid on the date when due. After the first year the premiums were made payable quarterly; the first quarterly premium being due on February 27, 1927. In addition to the above-mentioned provisions, the policy contained the following, called "Income Disability Clause":
The appellees asserted claims based on the above set out provision. It appeared that the last premium paid by or for the insured was the quarterly one due May 27, 1927, and that the insured died in April, 1929. The claims that appellant became liable to pay to the insured a monthly income of $50, beginning September 1, 1927, and continuing so long as he lived, and to pay the amount of the face of the policy to the beneficiary, were based on allegations to the effect that, during the spring and summer of the year 1927, and prior to September 27, 1927, while the policy was in full force and effect, all premiums having been paid when due, the insurer became totally and permanently disabled as a result of a disease occurring while the policy was in full force and effect, which disease was such as to prevent the insured then and at all times thereafter until his death from performing any work or conducting any business for compensation or profit. Pleading duly raised the questions whether the appellant did or did not incur the liability asserted if the insured did not, before the expiration of the thirty days allowed for the payment of the unpaid quarterly premium which was due August 27, 1927, make claim for the benefits stipulated for by the above set out provision and furnish to appellant satisfactory proof that the insured was totally and permanently disabled as defined in that provision.
Evidence adduced in the trial showed that at the time the policy was issued the insured was appellant's district manager at Plainview, Tex., his duties being to solicit and write life insurance for the appellant, to employ agents, to look after the appellant's business and build it up in that part of Texas; that the insured held...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Berry v. Lamar Life Ins. Co.
...Ins. Co., 284 U.S. 489, 52 S.Ct. 230, 76 L.Ed. 416. This decision affirmed a judgment of the federal circuit court of appeals reported in 50 F.2d 67. We quote from the United States Supreme Court as "Beginning with February 27, 1927, premiums were to be paid quarterly, with a grace period o......
-
Berry v. Lamar Life Ins. Co.
...Ins. Co., 284 U.S. 489, 52 8. Ct. 230, 76 L.Ed. 416. This decision affirmed a judgment of the federal circuit court of appeals reported in 50 F.2d 67. quote from the United States Supreme Court as follows: "Beginning with February 27, 1927, premiums were to be paid quarterly, with a grace p......
-
Hablutzel v. Home Life Ins. Co. of New York
... ... condition precedent. Bergholm v. Peoria Life, 284 ... U.S. 489. (f) The following cases ... Gunsul v ... American Surety Co., 308 Ill. 312, 139 N.E. 620, aff ... 225 Ill.App. 76; Maryland ... ...
-
Rio Grande Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. Bailey, 2131.
...280 S.W. 762; Mrs. Iris Christine Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co., 284 U.S. 489, 52 S.Ct. 230, 76 L.Ed. 416; Peoria Life Ins. Co. v. Bergholm, 5 Cir., 50 F.2d 67. If the provisions "* * * while this policy is in force, and with no premium more than four weeks in arrears" contained in the h......