Peppers v. Elder
| Decision Date | 09 September 1981 |
| Docket Number | No. 37597,37597 |
| Citation | Peppers v. Elder, 281 S.E.2d 582, 248 Ga. 136 (Ga. 1981) |
| Parties | PEPPERS v. ELDER et al. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
William D. Healan, Jr., Winder, for Jackson L. Peppers.
Richard B. Russell, III, John E. Stell, Jr., N. David Wages, Winder, for Thomas Elder et al.
The appeal is from the sustaining of a motion to dismiss.
Barrow County closed County Road Number 79 at the request of all of the adjacent landowners. The County then quit-claimed the former county roadway to the adjacent property owners. When the adjacent owners caused a ditch to be dug across the roadway, Jackson L. Peppers, in his capacity as a citizen-taxpayer of Barrow County, filed the present equity and mandamus action against the county and the adjoining landowners to set aside the conveyance, to remove the obstruction and to require the county to maintain the roadway as a public road.
After a jury was struck, Barrow County and the adjoining landowners orally moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim and for lack of standing to sue. The motion was heard in chambers without a reporter present and was granted, prompting this appeal.
1. Peppers first contends that he should have been given thirty days to respond to the motion because matters outside the pleadings were considered. Riverhill Community Assoc. v. Cobb County Board of Commissioners, 236 Ga. 856, 859, 226 S.E.2d 54 (1976). A respondent to a motion to dismiss is entitled to notice of conversion of the motion into one for summary judgment and to thirty days to respond to the motion for summary judgment unless such notice and opportunity are waived. Atlanta Associates v. Westminister Properties, Inc., 242 Ga. 462, 249 S.E.2d 252 (1978); Royston v. Royston, 236 Ga. 648, 225 S.E.2d 41 (1976). By consenting to the hearing of the motion in chambers that day and by arguing the merits of the motion without objecting to lack of notice, Peppers waived his right to notice and to further opportunity to respond. Register v. Kandlbinder, 231 Ga. 786, 204 S.E.2d 145 (1974).
2. Peppers concedes that the statutory notice to property owners required of a county before the closing of a county road need not have been given to him because he does not own property located on the road in issue. Code Ann. § 95A-619(b); See, McIntosh County v. Fisher, 242 Ga. 66, 247 S.E.2d 863 (1978); see also, Avery v. The Berry Schools, 211 Ga. 581, 87 S.E.2d 401 (1955). Instead, he asks, in essence, that this...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Spivey v. Safeway Ins. Co.
...on appeal, nor claim she was denied such notice and opportunity in the trial court, this issue has been waived. See Peppers v. Elder, 248 Ga. 136, 137, 281 S.E.2d 582 (1981); compare Smith v. Ticor Title Ins. Co. etc., 200 Ga.App. 534, 535, 408 S.E.2d 833 (1991); Smith v. Smith, 165 Ga.App.......
-
Rapps v. Cooke
...in the trial court's consideration of the untimely oral material. Gunter, 201 Ga. App. at 381,411 S.E.2d 115; Peppers v. Elder, 248 Ga. 136-137, 281 S.E.2d 582 (1981). Despite the waiver, there is no transcript of the sworn testimony given by Mr. Cooke nor any record of this oral evidence p......
- Kelley v. State
-
Famble v. State Farm Ins. Co.
...9-11-56(c)), unless such notice and opportunity to respond are waived. Compare Royston, supra at 649, 225 S.E.2d 41 with Peppers v. Elder, 248 Ga. 136, 281 S.E.2d 582. In the absence of the hearing transcripts, it cannot be determined from the posture of this record whether an oral motion f......