Perellie v. Crimson's Restaurant, Ltd.
| Decision Date | 25 February 1985 |
| Citation | 485 N.Y.S.2d 789,108 A.D.2d 903 |
| Parties | Peter PERELLIE, Respondent, v. CRIMSON'S RESTAURANT, LTD, etc, et al., Appellants. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Po W. Yuen, New York City (John Teschner, New York City, of counsel; Eric McCarthy, New York City, on brief), for appellants.
Murray, Bank & Sheer, White Plains (Michael S. Bank, White Plains, of counsel), for respondent.
Before LAZER, J.P., and MANGANO, GIBBONS and RUBIN, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract and fraud, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered December 2, 1983, which granted plaintiff's motion for a default judgment and calendared an inquest on the issue of damages.
Order affirmed, with costs.
The record indicates that all five of the defendants were personally served with a summons and complaint on July 29, 1983 and were in default even prior to August 31, 1983, when they retained counsel and when an answer on behalf of all five defendants was served upon, and rejected by, the plaintiff on or about September 26, 1983.
The determination of what constitutes a reasonable excuse for a default "lies within the sound discretion of the trial court" (DeVito v. Marine Midland Bank, 100 A.D.2d 530, 531, 473 N.Y.S.2d 218; Vernon v. Nassau County Med. Center, 102 A.D.2d 852, 477 N.Y.S.2d 24; CPLR 2005, 3012).
In the instant case the defendants failed to offer any excuse for their total disregard of the summonses and complaints which were served upon them on July 29, 1983. Moreover, even assuming, arguendo, that two of the individual defendants were not served with process until August 20, 1983, and were not in default on August 31, 1983, when they retained counsel, the result would not be any different. The record indicates that defendants' counsel received notice, by letter dated September 6, 1983, of plaintiff's counsel's intention to obtain a default judgment, but took no steps to seek leave from the court to serve a late answer until plaintiff placed the case on the inquest calendar. This conduct constituted an intentional default and is not excusable (Murphy v. Hall, 24 A.D.2d 892, 264 N.Y.S.2d 782). Finally, a review of defendants' opposing affidavits fail to demonstrate a meritorious defense to the action (Vernon v. Nassau County Med. Center, 102 A.D.2d 852, 477 N.Y.S.2d 24, supra ).
Under these circumstances, we find no reason to disturb...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Stevens v. Charles
...Realty, Inc., 10 A.D.3d 716, 781 N.Y.S.2d 901;Eretz Funding v. Shalosh Assoc., 266 A.D.2d 184, 697 N.Y.S.2d 335;Perellie v. Crimson's Rest., 108 A.D.2d 903, 904, 485 N.Y.S.2d 789). Since the defendant failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse, he was not entitled to relief pursuant to CPLR ......
-
Hayden v. Vevante
...and Cavalier their shares of the attorneys' fees (see Nahar v. Awan, 33 A.D.3d 680, 681, 821 N.Y.S.2d 894 ; Perellie v. Crimson's Rest., 108 A.D.2d 903, 904, 485 N.Y.S.2d 789 ).As the Shapiro firm failed to offer a reasonable excuse for its default, it is unnecessary to consider whether it ......
-
Jpmorgan Chase Bank, Nat'l Ass'n v. Lilker
...of foreclosure and sale and, in any event, failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for their default (see Perellie v. Crimson's Rest., 108 A.D.2d 903, 904, 485 N.Y.S.2d 789 ).Accordingly, we reverse the order and remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for a hearing to deter......
-
Merwitz v. Dental Care Services, P.C.
...necessary to prompt the exercise of the sound discretion of the court for the opening of a default judgment (see, Perellie v. Crimson's Rest., 108 A.D.2d 903, 485 N.Y.S.2d 789; see also, CPLR 2005, 3012[d]; De Vito v. Marine Midland Bank, 100 A.D.2d 530, 531, 473 N.Y.S.2d 218). As to the ex......